-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does anyone else here use Ubuntu? I set OpenDNS as my domain
resolvers, but DHCP later erased these settings. I should be able to
have static DNS servers while using DHCP for my local IP address right?
I tried adding the info to my dhcpclient.conf fil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arrakistor wrote:
> Nick, Roger, et al
>
> Does the ISP/network administrator know if a client is connected to the tor
> network or is
> the connection disguised? Essentially, does running tor create
> signatures?
>
> Regards,
> Arrakistor
>
>
No
Nick, Roger, et al
Does the ISP/network administrator know if a client is connected to the tor
network or is
the connection disguised? Essentially, does running tor create
signatures?
Regards,
Arrakistor
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 07:48:52AM -0700, Brian C wrote:
> http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2006/09/04/hot-or-not-revealing-hidden-services-by-their-clock-skew/
I was going to post this to the or-talk list, but I see someone beat
me to it :-)
To avoid any misunderstanding, I should add that the
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006, Matt Ghali wrote:
> Doesn't ORSN use an alternate-root scheme where there's no real
> guarantee you're getting the same answers anyone using the one true
> root would get?
That's the point of ORSN. Should the "real" US-controlled root go nuts
we still have some place that
Matt Ghali wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, numE wrote:
>
>> Maybe http://www.orsn.net/ would be even better than opendns.
>> OpenDns is commercial... orsn not.
>
> IIRC, OpenDNS does the same sort of "Lie on NXDOMAIN" foolishness that
> Earthlink has started doing, which is what the original poster
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, numE wrote:
Maybe http://www.orsn.net/ would be even better than opendns.
OpenDns is commercial... orsn not.
IIRC, OpenDNS does the same sort of "Lie on NXDOMAIN" foolishness
that Earthlink has started doing, which is what the original poster
was trying to escape.
Doesn
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:12:58AM -0700, Joe Clark wrote:
> First of all, thanks !
>
> You're saying to not rely on the cached-routers file (name and
> format), so what can I rely on as a list of all routers?
You can rely on cached-routers working for now, but we do not promise
never to c
First of all, thanks ! You're saying to not rely on the cached-routers file (name and format), so what can I rely on as a list of all routers? this: http://serifos.eecs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/exit.pl?textonly=1%22 or maybe this: (notice that this is by the old format) http://moria.mit.ed
Pascal Levasseur wrote:
> May I take the liberty to remove "This is called being a "middleman"
> node" from the wiki ?
Hi Pascal,
i fixed it.
Thal
Hello Roger,
>
> I've removed all trace of the word 'middleman' from the code, the docs,
> and the sample torrc file. So the only place you'll be encountering
> it is somebody else's docs or an old torrc file if you're using an old
> 0.1.0.x one. Are there places that I missed?
>
By the way, the
http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2006/09/04/hot-or-not-revealing-hidden-services-by-their-clock-skew/
This is on the front page of reddit.com right now, so it should get some
attention.
Murdoch's paper is here:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~sjm217/papers/ccs06hotornot.pdf
12 matches
Mail list logo
