-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this question is not directly related to the described case.
I would like to contribute some more Tor servers running at different
providers across Germany (probably not in the same /16 network). My
current server is a virtual server at 1blu
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 11:45:15AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
I would like to contribute some more Tor servers running at different
providers across Germany (probably not in the same /16 network). My
current server is a virtual server at 1blu that has a bandwidth of 931
What kind of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What kind of traffic plan to you have with 1blu, and how much do you
pay for it?
They offer 1blu-vServer Unlimited with unlimited traffic volume for 17
euros per month. I don't know if it's the best offering, so I decided to
give them a try. Are
Do you think it's a privacy problem to run 3 to 5 servers? All servers
would be non-exit servers because of the current habit of the German
police to collect all exit servers. Of course, I will set the family entry.
Please do run as many servers as you can afford. There is absolutely no
Juliusz Chroboczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Gersten:
getting keep-alive to work will help a lot with web browsing,
Fabian Keil:
Is this an assumption or did you just forget to show your benchmarks
to back this claim up?
I've just tested this by running
wget -p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to contribute some more Tor servers running at different
providers across Germany (probably not in the same /16 network). My
current server is a virtual server at 1blu that has a bandwidth of 931
KB/s which makes it the 71st fastest
With http://www.kde.org/screenshots/:
So according to this test, this page downloads roughly two times
faster through Polipo/tor than through Privoxy/tor, right?
I also tested with another website (http://www.spiegel.de/):
This test is not representative: this is an HTTP/1.0 site. There are
Juliusz Chroboczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With http://www.kde.org/screenshots/:
So according to this test, this page downloads roughly two times
faster through Polipo/tor than through Privoxy/tor, right?
It certainly did for the five samples I took.
I also tested with another website
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Karsten, (strange to write that *g*)
do you run a TOR server on a virtual server without connection faults?
A year ago, I tested a tor server on virtual hardware (Virtuozzo) and I
got many TCP connection faults in /proc/user_beancounters.
Is
[CC-ing polipo-users again]
this is an HTTP/1.0 site. There are fortunately very few of these
left nowadays.
What exactly is the problem with the site? Watching the circuits in
Vidalia I had the impression that Polipo used keep-alive.
HTTP/1.0 keepalives and HTTP/1.1 persistent
Polipo/tor was still 13% faster?
To which numbers are you referring here?
Sorry, I got confused.
However if I understand you correctly, you're saying that
I intentionally...
My apologies, I got carried away.
Juliusz
Thus spake Koh Choon Lin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If you can't or don't want to switch ISP you could
rent a server with uncensored net access and use
it as proxy.
I am working in Singapore and the government branded Tor as criminal
skills. Thus, I have to go through a proxy even to get the
12 matches
Mail list logo