Google in China

2010-01-14 Thread downie -
This may have consequences for demand for (or attacks against) Tor: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html GD _ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.

[Relay]BandwidthRate interpretation

2010-01-14 Thread grarpamp
RBR is doc'd to be only relay rate + directory requests. Is and if so, where is the client rate limited? Is and if so, where is the HS [onion] rate limited? Is and if so, where is there a distinction made between non-exit and exit rate? And which rate, if any, is the parent rate? Does BR = RBR

something wrong?

2010-01-14 Thread Gaofeng He
I haven't received mails from this or-talk since 2010.1.13! Anything wrong? 2010-01-14 Gaofeng He Tor in China!

Re: Google in China

2010-01-14 Thread coderman
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:23 PM, downie - downgeo...@hotmail.com wrote: This may have consequences for demand for (or attacks against) Tor: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html weaponized 0days in IE leveraged for this assault are a disturbing escalation. the

Re: Google in China

2010-01-14 Thread Ted Smith
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:55 -0800, coderman wrote: Google funding/developing large scale decentralized anonymity and circumvention technologies would be a welcome retort against the coming constraints in .cn and elsewhere. Let's not forget that as far as Google is concerned, if we have

Re: Google in China

2010-01-14 Thread Programmer In Training
On 1/14/2010 6:03 PM, Ted Smith wrote: On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:55 -0800, coderman wrote: Google funding/developing large scale decentralized anonymity and circumvention technologies would be a welcome retort against the coming constraints in .cn and elsewhere. Let's not forget that as far

Re: Google in China

2010-01-14 Thread Ted Smith
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 18:26 -0600, Programmer In Training wrote: On 1/14/2010 6:03 PM, Ted Smith wrote: On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:55 -0800, coderman wrote: Google funding/developing large scale decentralized anonymity and circumvention technologies would be a welcome retort against the

Re: Google in China

2010-01-14 Thread coderman
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Ted Smith ted...@gmail.com wrote: ... Opposing censorship (not on moral grounds, but they've attacked us so we're leaving grounds) is very different from supporting anonymity. right. hence would be nice as a qualifier. in any case, it is interesting that these

Re: Failed to decode requested authority digest

2010-01-14 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de wrote: Olaf Selke wrote: since a couple of days tor logs an error condition about every 32 hours. Even looking at the code I don't really understand the cause. Jan 07 00:56:46.100 [warn] Failed to decode requested authority

Re: Failed to decode requested authority digest

2010-01-14 Thread Drake Wilson
Quoth Nick Mathewson ni...@torproject.org, on 2010-01-14 21:49:33 -0500: Jan 12 08:57:59.119 [warn] Failed to decode requested authority digest 14C131%2027B6B5%20585769%2081349F%20E2A2AF%20E8A9C4. Jan 14 11:40:05.641 [warn] Failed to decode requested authority digest