On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:27:26AM -0800, j...@jcosby.com wrote 0.3K bytes in
10 lines about:
: I just noticed that on closing a Firefox session, google cookies are not
: removed. I have to toggle Tor to remove them. Is this normal?
Do you mean toggle torbutton? It depends what you have told tor
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Marco Bonetti
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> That matches with my impressions of it. All it does is define
>> "__DARWIN_UNIX03" and "IPHONE". The only place in Tor that looks at
>> "IPHONE" is set_max_file_des
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Soviet Union wrote:
> I have some the next recored in logs of the Tor:
> [warn] Bug: Duplicate call to connection_mark_for_close at
> connection.c:1175 (first at connection_edge.c:1618)
> What mean that bug and what I need to do? (or not I need to do anythin?)
> **
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Mansur Marvanov wrote:
> Oh, I got the meaning of exit-nodes: it's for selection the preferred
> country as exit of your route.
> But still the question is How Tor choose the route?
>
The best specification of this is in the path-spec.txt document
shipped with the
2010/2/12 ilter yüksel :
> Hello,
>
> For exit router selection path-spec says that;
>
> "For circuits that do not need to be "fast", when choosing among multiple
> candidates for a path element, we choose randomly. For "fast" circuits, we
> pick a given router as an exit with probability proportio
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 6:10 AM, wrote:
> This thread is being forked from the original as it doesn't entirely
> depend on the user(s) using bridges and this problem. I understand
> the purpose of Tor and know individuals, organizations, as well as
> governments use Tor, so why be surprised when
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 05:27:21AM -0500, twinkletoedtur...@safe-mail.net wrote
5.1K bytes in 106 lines about:
: This has already been discussed previously, I was moving on to ask if
: this feature could be added, not debated.
The simple answer right now is no. There is exactly one person workin
Hi!
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:45:18AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>Hannah Schroeter wrote (12 Feb 2010 23:13:51 GMT) :
>> However, my French is a bit lacking
>Fixed, thanks for the report.
Cool, I see it, also the language choice for those who actually prefer
French.
>> and the certificate problem
Hi again,
please note that a weird bug [1] often prevents amnesia systems to
connect to the Tor network, at least in a user-friendly way.
This seems to be caused by a bug in Tor, that has been reported [2].
[1] https://amnesia.boum.org/bugs/tor_vs_networkmanager/
[2] https://bugs.torproject.org/
Hi!
Hannah Schroeter wrote (12 Feb 2010 23:13:51 GMT) :
> However, my French is a bit lacking
Fixed, thanks for the report.
> and the certificate problem is still there (konqueror doesn't
> recognize it because of the cacert root certificate). (Curiously,
> firefox *does* recognize it.)
cacert'
Hi!
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:44:06PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>Hi,
>Hannah Schroeter wrote (10 Feb 2010 15:33:48 GMT) :
>> I don't see a *completely* automatic solution, and I didn't mean it
>> either. I meant things like announcing them by mail (and ensuring
>> that one doesn't need *too* frequ
Hi,
Hannah Schroeter wrote (10 Feb 2010 15:33:48 GMT) :
> I don't see a *completely* automatic solution, and I didn't mean it
> either. I meant things like announcing them by mail (and ensuring
> that one doesn't need *too* frequent updates, as that would pose
> additional workload on seed operato
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:08:45PM +, Tom Hek wrote:
> On 4 feb 2010, at 19:55, Attac Heidenheim wrote:
>
> > Hallo,
> > does anybody own Tor-relays or exit-nodes running on "Leaseweb" or
> > "Rapidswitch" ?
> > Any suggestions or warnings concerning "Leaseweb" or "Rapidswitch" ?
>
> I have t
Perhaps the best choice would be the one used by the most people.
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/01/tracking-by-user-agent
Cheers,
Michael Holstein
Cleveland State University
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@to
On Feb 12, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Michael Holstein wrote:
Why not simply block that entire network in the Exit policy?
You're missing the point .. we already blocked our *own* /16 in the
exit. The problem was the thousands of academic journals, all of which
have distinct addresses, that consider
> Why not simply block that entire network in the Exit policy?
You're missing the point .. we already blocked our *own* /16 in the
exit. The problem was the thousands of academic journals, all of which
have distinct addresses, that consider any traffic from our /16 as being
"on campus" and thus n
Thanks, that got me going.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Runa Sandvik wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Charles Eubanks
> wrote:
>> I just installed TOR on OSX and I am trying to connect. My ISP is AT&T
>> Uverse.
>> I never get past 10% "Establishing encrypted directory connection"
On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Michael Holstein wrote:
Could you bind your exit traffic to IPs outside your University's
primary block?
Not sure what you mean by "bind to outside IP", but our network is a
contiguous /16. We would have to register for extra /24s from ARIN,
and
that costs mo
> Could you bind your exit traffic to IPs outside your University's
> primary block?
Not sure what you mean by "bind to outside IP", but our network is a
contiguous /16. We would have to register for extra /24s from ARIN, and
that costs money.
Cheers,
Michael Holstein
Cleveland State University
On 02/11/2010 05:58 PM, Peter Farver wrote:
> I meant clients for TOR were blocked. Yes, for all students and
> faculty. I believe the attacks were from the TOR exit nodes, but I
> will try to get more information from network administrators. I have
> not tried bridges yet, but maybe I will obta
This thread is being forked from the original as it doesn't entirely
depend on the user(s) using bridges and this problem. I understand
the purpose of Tor and know individuals, organizations, as well as
governments use Tor, so why be surprised when governments use Tor?
But if these individuals are
Marco Bonetti:
"I'm not getting the point of why there should be choice: if the
users using this feature start changing they UA, the blending will be a
lot more weak."
This has already been discussed previously, I was moving on to ask if
this feature could be added, not debated.
"If you really n
Hello,
For exit router selection path-spec says that;
"For circuits that do not need to be "fast", when choosing among multiple
candidates for a path element, we choose randomly. For "fast" circuits, we
pick a given router as an exit with probability proportional to its
bandwidth."
Could anybody
Il 11/02/2010 22:17, Michael Holstein ha scritto:
> .. but the above problem is ultimately what forced us to do the same
> thing (although we just prohibit the operation of an exit).
My university's department of computer sciences stopped an exit node
because both a) some DMCA notices for alleged
24 matches
Mail list logo
