Re: Tor documentation

2010-03-02 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:18:17AM -0500, zzzjethro...@email2me.net wrote: > Here it is: The last two versions of TOR have not been documented, >thus cannot be trusted. Versions 0.2.1.22 and 0.2.1.21 are the only ones >that can be trusted (possibly only 0.2.1.21). > Someone want to check or point m

Tor documentation

2010-03-02 Thread zzzjethro666
Hope this doesn't rankle anyone's last nerve but I found this on the Onion Forum last night and am wondering how to verify it? I can just ask here, "does anyone know if this is true or not and what it might mean to someone's anonymity regarding Tor, and the clients trust of Tor? I suppose thi

Re: Data Retention Law Violates German Constitution

2010-03-02 Thread F. Fox
Sven Anderson wrote: (snip) > Today the Federal Constitutional Court decided, that the data retention law violates the German Constitution and all data must be deleted immediately. (snip) Epic win! -- F. Fox *** To unsubscrib

Re: Full bandwidth is not used.

2010-03-02 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Hannah, Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:45 +0100 schrieb Hannah: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:43:13AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > >Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:30 +0100 schrieb Hannah: > >> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:26:57AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > >> >[...] > > >> >I am out of ideas

Re: Full bandwidth is not used.

2010-03-02 Thread Hannah
Hi! On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:43:13AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: >Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:30 +0100 schrieb Hannah: >> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:26:57AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: >> >[...] >> >I am out of ideas. It would be really nice, if someone could help, >> >because otherwise the pai

Re: Full bandwidth is not used.

2010-03-02 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Hannah, Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:30 +0100 schrieb Hannah: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:26:57AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > >[...] > > >I am out of ideas. It would be really nice, if someone could help, > >because otherwise the paid traffic volume will be wasted. > > Did you check CP

Re: Full bandwidth is not used.

2010-03-02 Thread Hannah
Hi! On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:26:57AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: >[...] >I am out of ideas. It would be really nice, if someone could help, >because otherwise the paid traffic volume will be wasted. Did you check CPU usage? If your CPU is maxed out, a higher configured bandwidth allowance won't

Re: Full bandwidth is not used.

2010-03-02 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Tor folks, Am Montag, den 01.03.2010, 22:21 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel: > my Tor server is running for over three days now, but the average > bandwidth usage shown by ARM [1] is only 100 KB/s for uploaded and > downloaded. The usage increased during the first two days but has > stagnated now.

Re: Full bandwidth is not used.

2010-03-02 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear SwissTor, thank you for your answer. Am Montag, den 01.03.2010, 23:47 +0100 schrieb starslights: > Well i am not sure but look like you must first upgrade your Tor version to > the > last sable minimum 0.2.1.24 who i think will first fix the "xx:xx:xx > [WARN] Rejecting insecure

Re: repetitive address change message

2010-03-02 Thread Richard Johnson
At 14:59 -0700 on 2010-03-02, Richard Johnson wrote: > tor 0.2.1.22 complains, and logs (at info level or lower) that it's trying > something else. tor 0.2.1.24 complains also, but then picks an apparently > random address. This typically fails other checks, so it repeats. It logs > these "chang

Re: repetitive address change message

2010-03-02 Thread Richard Johnson
At 03:30 -0600 on 2010-03-02, Scott Bennett wrote: > However, once reconnected, my computer got a brand-new IP address assigned > on a net I didn't know belonged to them. Shortly afterward, inadyn noticed > the change and updated the A RR at dyndns.org to reflect the new address. > Soon after that

Re: Data Retention Law Violates German Constitution

2010-03-02 Thread Sven Anderson
On 02.03.2010 15:27, Robert Marquardt wrote: We should not forget that the court did not forbid the storage of data but rather criticised the specific legislation. It did not challenge the 2006 EU directive thats the basis of the law. The only way to get rid of the data retention laws across eu

Re: Data Retention Law Violates German Constitution

2010-03-02 Thread Robert Marquardt
We should not forget that the court did not forbid the storage of data but rather criticised the specific legislation. It did not challenge the 2006 EU directive thats the basis of the law. The only way to get rid of the data retention laws across europe is that the european union repeal the di

Re: Data Retention Law Violates German Constitution

2010-03-02 Thread Marco Bonetti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 /me flooded thanks everybody! - -- Marco Bonetti Tor research and other stuff: http://sid77.slackware.it/ Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://workaround.ch/ Linux-live for powerpc: http://workaround.ch/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live/ My GnuPG key id

Re: Data Retention Law Violates German Constitution

2010-03-02 Thread starslights
here the English Article http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/03/02/1283449/german-high-court-telecom- data.html signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Data Retention Law Violates German Constitution

2010-03-02 Thread Sven Anderson
On 02.03.2010 14:13, Sven Anderson wrote: On 02.03.2010 14:04, Marco Bonetti wrote: Sven Anderson wrote: Here a German article: http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/0,1518,681122,00.html Do you, or anyone else, have an English article on this topic? In Italy we've something very similar

Re: Data Retention Law Violates German Constitution

2010-03-02 Thread Sven Anderson
On 02.03.2010 14:04, Marco Bonetti wrote: Sven Anderson wrote: Here a German article: http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/0,1518,681122,00.html Do you, or anyone else, have an English article on this topic? In Italy we've something very similar since many years. Here is is a short one

Re: Data Retention Law Violates German Constitution

2010-03-02 Thread Marco Bonetti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sven Anderson wrote: > Here a German article: > http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/0,1518,681122,00.html Do you, or anyone else, have an English article on this topic? In Italy we've something very similar since many years. - -- Marco Bonetti

Re: Data Retention Law Violates German Constitution

2010-03-02 Thread Matej Kovacic
Hi, > Thanks for the info, it's great to read that and hope that's will help to > protect the our privacy . It seems data retention is not completely banned, the problem is only german implementation. However, it is important thing. bye, Matej *

Re: Data Retention Law Violates German Constitution

2010-03-02 Thread starslights
Hi Sven, Thanks for the info, it's great to read that and hope that's will help to protect the our privacy . Great done Best Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Data Retention Law Violates German Constitution

2010-03-02 Thread Sven Anderson
Hi there, regardless of it's relevance for Tor nodes, there are very good news for Germany, and probably the rest of the European Union. Today the Federal Constitutional Court decided, that the data retention law violates the German Constitution and all data must be deleted immediately. This

repetitive address change message

2010-03-02 Thread Scott Bennett
Something happened to my Internet connection this evening while I was away. When I came back, I called the ISP, and they got it working again. However, once reconnected, my computer got a brand-new IP address assigned on a net I didn't know belonged to them. Shortly afterward, inadyn noticed