On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 01:10:28AM +0200, t...@wiredwings.com wrote 1.7K bytes
in 47 lines about:
: (Forwarded with permission)
Our standard response is
https://www.torproject.org/faq-abuse.html.en#TracingUsers
: There is a teenager in New York who has decided to create new accounts
: to post li
some alternatives that dont require blocking Tor:
- authenticate new members by non-electronic means
- disallow posting of links by new members
- moderate content
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 01:10:28AM +0200, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> (Forwarded with permission)
>
> Original Message
>
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:45:51PM -0400, and...@torproject.org wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:36:15PM -0400, torh...@safe-mail.net wrote 0.4K
> bytes in 6 lines about:
> : Since my node is not an exit node, does that really matter that my ISP is
> hijacking DNS requests? Does anyone know ho
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:36:15PM -0400, torh...@safe-mail.net wrote 0.4K
bytes in 6 lines about:
: Since my node is not an exit node, does that really matter that my ISP is
hijacking DNS requests? Does anyone know how that can effect my non-exit node?
It just means tor won't trust your dns and
Thanks for all the responses.
Since my node is not an exit node, does that really matter that my ISP is
hijacking DNS requests? Does anyone know how that can effect my non-exit node?
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord..
(Forwarded with permission)
Original Message
Subject: Posting of links to inappropriate sites on children's website
via Tor
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:44:26 -0400
From: Amos Blanton
To: ab...@torservers.net
Greetings,
I help manage the community on the Scratch website.
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:28:31 -0400
torh...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> Can you explain the DNs hijacking thing? I don't understand what that
> means/the implications.
It means your ISP dns server is giving a response other than NXDOMAIN
for invalid domains. You can learn more about nxdomain redirects
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:22 AM, wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I just upgraded my internet speed and have been running a Tor Relay for
> around two days or so.
>
> I have set up 2-3 tor relays before so I understand (I think) how to set one
> up.
>
> Here's the problem:
>
> In the past two days, Vid
Can you explain the DNs hijacking thing? I don't understand what that means/the
implications.
I guess I'll wait a little longer before freaking out then... It's just the
last two Tor relays I set up, within 3-4 hours of being online, they were
operating at max capacity...
> Hello ,
>
> you sho
Hello ,
you should consider change of your DNS. Maybe it isn't problem in this
specific issue, but DNS hijacking isn't good at all.
I think there is not problem with your relay. Revvvolution appears on
torstatus.blutmagie.de without any problem so don't panic. In my case
it took many days until c
Hello all.
I just upgraded my internet speed and have been running a Tor Relay for around
two days or so.
I have set up 2-3 tor relays before so I understand (I think) how to set one up.
Here's the problem:
In the past two days, Vidalia says I've received 200MBs of data and sent around
500MBs
hello,
I am after advice how to control/influence the time spent using a circuit.
A few ideas from browsing the manual:
- add port 80 to LongLivedPorts
- decrease CircuitBuildTimeout so have more robust longer lived circuits (or
shorter?)
- set high CircuitStreamTimeout to change circuits less of
12 matches
Mail list logo
