Orionjur Tor-admin wrote:
> Olaf Selke wrote:
>> Am 19.08.2010 17:49, schrieb Orionjur Tor-admin:
>>> After I write there MyFamily
>>> 90ECA7259B93B08FEC9872B2A1C065A0C05B2EE4,9087CA232B155B415AD81C0D3F636FC898246DEB
>>> I have the next errors output when I reatart my Tor daemon:
>> prepend each fi
>
> From: Paul Syverson
Date: Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:29 PM
...
Also, it is much easier for IBM and Oracle to understand the RoI in linux
> than for such players, qua corporate position, to see the RoI in Tor, but
> even that still occurred over years of footdragging, hedging bets, etc.
...
Thus spake Mike Perry (mikepe...@fscked.org):
> > So if you were the Global Traffic Analysis Adversary then you would
> > distract, delay, deny and defend lack of protection from your analysis.
> > If you also funded the project then that would make that task easier.
>
> Don't forget all the Un
Orionjur Tor-admin writes:
> I think so too.
> But I have an asking - were there any court proceedings (successful or
> not) against tor-users based on their deanonimisation in the USA?
> Because I never hear or read about it I very want to know it.
> If there were no such proceedings it seems to
Olaf Selke wrote:
> Am 19.08.2010 17:49, schrieb Orionjur Tor-admin:
>> After I write there MyFamily
>> 90ECA7259B93B08FEC9872B2A1C065A0C05B2EE4,9087CA232B155B415AD81C0D3F636FC898246DEB
>> I have the next errors output when I reatart my Tor daemon:
>
> prepend each fingerprint with a $ sign. Once
Olaf Selke wrote:
> Am 19.08.2010 17:49, schrieb Orionjur Tor-admin:
>> After I write there MyFamily
>> 90ECA7259B93B08FEC9872B2A1C065A0C05B2EE4,9087CA232B155B415AD81C0D3F636FC898246DEB
>> I have the next errors output when I reatart my Tor daemon:
>
> prepend each fingerprint with a $ sign. Once
Am 19.08.2010 17:49, schrieb Orionjur Tor-admin:
>
> After I write there MyFamily
> 90ECA7259B93B08FEC9872B2A1C065A0C05B2EE4,9087CA232B155B415AD81C0D3F636FC898246DEB
> I have the next errors output when I reatart my Tor daemon:
prepend each fingerprint with a $ sign. Once I made the same mistake.
Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
> While I do think it's good to see the funding there are two points that
> are important to remember.
>
> 1) this is a freesoftware project the code is there for all to see,
> hopefully clueful people other than the US Government are reading it.
>
> 2) no matter who's f
Orionjur Tor-admin wrote:
> Andrew Lewman wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:20:25 +
>> Orionjur Tor-admin wrote:
>>
>>> Where I can find it for pointing out "MyFamily" in /etc/torrc ?
>>> I find only my node fingerprint.
>> That's your keyid, or look for the log message on start:
>> [notice] Yo
Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:20:25 +
> Orionjur Tor-admin wrote:
>
>> Where I can find it for pointing out "MyFamily" in /etc/torrc ?
>> I find only my node fingerprint.
>
> That's your keyid, or look for the log message on start:
> [notice] Your Tor server's identity key fi
it seems the censoredHeaders not working for me. have anyone tried to
use this and add useragent?
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/t
I go to http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/ and have a look at the exit
node "gigatux" called emohawk2.gigatux.com and located at
78.129.201.189.
This appears to be located in the UK according to blutmagie.de.
whois and RIPE agree with blutmagie. Gmail is wrong. Perhaps they use
different geoip d
12 matches
Mail list logo
