'Perfect Privacy', a commercial anon-service (25 Euros/month) for
"encrypting your Internet and keep your identity and privacy protected
from prying eyes" was raided on friday in Germany.
http://www.perfect-privacy.com/index.html
Niklas
https://forum.perfect-privacy.com/showthread.php?t=2183
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Matthew wrote:
> It is also worth noting that Craigslist prevents the use of Tor albeit in a
> very strange way.
>
> If you try to post using Tor the ad will be permitted at first and people
> can contact you. However, after about 15 minutes (and it is always abou
> It is also worth noting that Craigslist prevents the use of Tor albeit in a
> very strange way.
I can second having similar problems with Craigslist, albeit from another
fixed, yet listed, location on the globe. Any Torizens in SF, feel free to swing
by CL and offer them your cluebat, I offer v
It is also worth noting that Craigslist prevents the use of Tor albeit in
a very strange way.
If you try to post using Tor the ad will be permitted at first and people
can contact you. However, after about 15 minutes (and it is always about
15 minutes) the post is "flagged" and disappears.
>>> I can see it could provide some protection against...
>> No. Why do you think it could?
> - because by default - lots of additional reasons...
The shim was just supposed to be a tool so you could hook into
an http[s] stream and do whatever with it, or nothing at all.
For instance, I've always
On 8/23/2010 2:05 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:52:17 +
James Brown wrote:
"Our records indicate that your password may have been shared with
another person, or that an anonymising proxy to access your PayPal
Account may be in use. Should this be the case, it would mean a
Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:52:17 +
> James Brown wrote:
>> "Our records indicate that your password may have been shared with
>> another person, or that an anonymising proxy to access your PayPal
>> Account may be in use. Should this be the case, it would mean a
>> violation
Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:52:17 +
> James Brown wrote:
>> "Our records indicate that your password may have been shared with
>> another person, or that an anonymising proxy to access your PayPal
>> Account may be in use. Should this be the case, it would mean a
>> violation
Hm, I use TOR almost every time I use paypal, especially if I am
on a site I do not trust well or its the first time I been on the
site. So far, I have never had an issue other than occasionally
locking my account.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:48 AM, James Brown wrote:
> They block accounts of
Hm, I use Top almost every time I use pay pay, Especially if I am
on a site I do Not trust well or its the first time I been on the
site. So far, I have never had an issue other than occasionally
locking my account.
Jon
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:48 AM, James Brown wrote:
> They block accoun
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:52:17 +
James Brown wrote:
> "Our records indicate that your password may have been shared with
> another person, or that an anonymising proxy to access your PayPal
> Account may be in use. Should this be the case, it would mean a
> violation of our User Agreement.
They
Andrew Lewman wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:48:13 +
> > James Brown wrote:
> >
>> >> They block accounts of their user if users ised the Tor or another
>> >> anonymous proxy!!!
> >
> > I think the answer here is more complex. I've used tor's paypal-based
> > donation account through Tor w
Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:48:13 +
> James Brown wrote:
>
>> They block accounts of their user if users ised the Tor or another
>> anonymous proxy!!!
>
> I think the answer here is more complex. I've used tor's paypal-based
> donation account through Tor without issue for
Andrew Lewman writes:
> I've attempted to have conversations with Paypal to no avail. Getting
> an actual human to talk to you with a clue about their security
> measures is incredibly difficult.
I'll put Andrew in touch with a contact at PayPal. Unfortunately,
their view may be that Tor is fre
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, morphium wrote:
>> I can see it could provide some
>> protection against ssl/ssh mitm attacks.
>
> No. Why do you think it could?
- because by default applications trust either a large, promiscuous
set of certificate authorities, or even worse, use the operating
s
And I imagine that means you were too nice to respond with "Can I
please talk to someone who actually understands what I am talking
about?"
Way back in the day when ISPs offered shell accounts, I noticed that
ping was in sbin on solaris. So I made myself a ~/bin dir and made a
sym link to ping (I
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:48:13 +
James Brown wrote:
> They block accounts of their user if users ised the Tor or another
> anonymous proxy!!!
I think the answer here is more complex. I've used tor's paypal-based
donation account through Tor without issue for years. Possibly, Paypal
has a bot
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> ...
> I think it's obvious that the best way of using tor is running your
> torrified apps in a VM which can only access the outside world via
> TOR. This provides the highest protection from network leaks and also
> partially thwarts finge
> For the most part, anything involving HTTPS, needs to be taken care of in
> the browser itself.
My personal opinion (and I'm the author of Polipo) is that all content
munging should be done in the browser -- munging in the proxy is
a broken design. Unfortunately, the browser vendors care more a
On 2010-08-23 18:48, James Brown wrote:
> They block accounts of their user if users ised the Tor or another
> anonymous proxy!!!
Hmm.
Have I been lucky? (non-exit...)
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org
They block accounts of their user if users ised the Tor or another
anonymous proxy!!!
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
> I can see it could provide some
> protection against ssl/ssh mitm attacks.
No. Why do you think it could?
> It could better protect the
> "browser" (or other app) by moving some of the ssl/tls/cert logic out to an
> open source proxy of sorts.
Protect? Of what? How?
> It could better protect
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:18 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>
>
> Nothing in the open source field can do so yet afaik.
>
> To do it, a shim needs to be coded and placed between the application and
> Tor.
> user <-> browser <-> [optional tool] <-> shim <-> tor:9050
>
> The shim needs to listen on a proxy por
23 matches
Mail list logo
