I am a newbie here, so perhaps this is an overly naive response to this
subject.
I am using Windows XP and I am behind a digital modem provided by AT&T.
That modem is the DNS for my local network.
I see that message at times when I think that AT&T is re-booting that=20
modem (lately that is
On 4/20/2010 6:14 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:50:42 -0500 (CDT) I wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:00:20 -0500 David Carlson
wrote:
I am a newbie here, so perhaps this is an overly naive response to this
All of us have been at some point
On 8/7/2010 6:36 AM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:48:36PM -0700, mikepe...@fscked.org wrote 3.4K bytes
in 84 lines about:
: Now personally, I think that what might be more likely to win you
: points with your ISP is to reiterate that these events are
: extremely rare i
On 8/9/2010 6:38 PM, Michael Gomboc wrote:
If they would say "Do rely on it for strong anonymity" would you feel
more secure? :-)
2010/8/9 spacemarc mailto:spacem...@gmail.com>>
Hi all,
why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for
strong anonymity"? If not
On 8/23/2010 2:05 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:52:17 +
James Brown wrote:
"Our records indicate that your password may have been shared with
another person, or that an anonymising proxy to access your PayPal
Account may be in use. Should this be the case, it would mean a
On 8/24/2010 5:09 AM, Michael Scheinost wrote:
On 08/23/2010 10:04 PM, David Carlson wrote:
I am a newbie here. Since they use SSL, isn't it overkill to route your
connection through Tor? I know it is a pain to switch Tor on and off
No, it's not an overkill since tor does not prov
On 8/24/2010 9:56 AM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:04:04 -0500
David Carlson wrote:
I am a newbie here. Since they use SSL, isn't it overkill to route
your connection through Tor? I know it is a pain to switch Tor on
and off when multitasking, but it would seem tha
On 9/5/2010 4:11 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:55 +0100, "Matthew" wrote:
Hello,
I have yet another question that relates to the effectiveness of Tor.
Gmail (and therefore presumably other webmail operators) knows my
computer's time zone. It does not know the time per se
On 9/9/2010 9:12 AM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:03:16 +0100
Matthew wrote:
[17:50:35] Your Computer's Clock is Potentially Incorrect - Tor has
determined that your computer's clock may be set to 7285 seconds in
the future compared to the source "DIRSERV:80.239.147.21:443".
On 11/6/2010 1:02 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:
> I wrote:
>> http://news.antiwar.com/2010/11/05/us-censors-muslim-websites-list-of-british-mps-who-supported-iraq-war/
>>
>> Using exit "chuckthecanuck" gives a Google (!) error page, saying URL
>> not found. I'll add that exit to my ExcludeExit
Hi,
I am forbidden to access the server yelp.com. Is that because I am a
Tor exit node?
Thanks
David
0xDC7C8BF3.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
On 1/30/2011 1:53 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:24 -0600, "David Carlson"
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am forbidden to access the server yelp.com. Is that because I am a
>> Tor exit node?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
On 2/7/2011 1:00 PM, Matthew wrote:
> I am wondering to what degree people on this list have problems with
> e-mails going into spam folders because they are using tor nodes.
>
> I refer to sending from a webmail (Hotmail, Yahoo, Gmail, AOL, etc) to
> another webmail.
>
> It seems to me that e-mail
13 matches
Mail list logo
