On 2011-02-12 11:01, Jim wrote:
I currently cannot reach https://ssl.scroogle.org:443/ via Tor.
Me too.
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body.
On 2011-01-31 15:26, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
I've set up a bridge relay and it seems to work for a bit and then
stop routing traffic. I'm wondering if I've misconfigured it or
something.
Get your 'external' address (http://checkip.dyndns.com/) and start your
bridge with this IP.
Better:
On 2011-01-29 19:46, Jan Weiher wrote:
while scrolling through the tor status page (torstatus.blutmagie.de), I
stumpled upon the following node (the reason why it came to my eye was
the long uptime):
gatereloaded 550C C972 4FA7 7C7F 9260 B939 89D2 2A70 654D 3B92
This node looks
On 2011-01-28 20:23, scar wrote:
Unfortunately, there still exist some problems and hiccups i've been
dealing with. While the DMCA complaints have so far stopped, my
internet has been disabled three times now due to 'malicious' behavior.
Maybe it will help to disable the exit to your isp's
If you start Tor with: Bridge IP:ORPort fingerprint and there exists
an old entry with the same fingerprint in
'/var/lib/tor/cached-descriptors' then 'IP:ORPort' (or 'url:ORPort')
will be disregarded and the ''IP:ORPort' from the old entry is used instead.
This is bad for unregistered bridges
On 2010-12-23 06:49, Lu Wei wrote:
Only a little inconvenience is that bridge address must be entered
digitally.
You can also use the following Syntax:
Bridge URL:portnumber fingerprint
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail
On 2010-11-14 14:11, I wrote:
Today my Tor-Node v0.2.2.17-alpha (git-d30d4eb843f12e65) crashed two
times with the following log-entries:
###
Nov 14 10:22:41.627 [info] Consensus includes unrecognized authority
'gabelmoo-legacy' at 80.190.246.100:8180 (contact n/a; identity
Today my Tor-Node v0.2.2.17-alpha (git-d30d4eb843f12e65) crashed two
times with the following log-entries:
###
Nov 14 10:22:41.627 [info] Consensus includes unrecognized authority
'gabelmoo-legacy' at 80.190.246.100:8180 (contact n/a; identity
81349FC1F2DBA2C2C11B45CB9706637D480AB913)
Nov 14
On 2010-11-01 19:47, James Brown wrote:
I have the next recordes in my logs of the privoxy:
Nov 01 16:16:53.541 7f2ec27fa6f0 Info: Privoxy version 3.0.13
Nov 01 16:16:53.567 7f2ec27fa6f0 Info: Program name: /usr/sbin/privoxy
Nov 01 16:16:53.572 7f2ec27fa6f0 Info: Listening on port 8118 on IP
On 2010-10-04 18:02, Gitano wrote:
Today I found these two entries in the logfile of my relay (Picolino):
Oct 03 20:20:46.513 [warn] Tried connecting to router at
78.53.207.239:443, but identity key was not as expected: wanted
8557B4AA9D3E5784E013F15C310DBFF593687D84 but got
Today I found these two entries in the logfile of my relay (Picolino):
Oct 03 20:20:46.513 [warn] Tried connecting to router at
78.53.207.239:443, but identity key was not as expected: wanted
8557B4AA9D3E5784E013F15C310DBFF593687D84 but got
C221743B643DE6178AC034370E324A0B232E75DA.
Oct 04
On 2010-09-29 20:19, Matthew wrote:
I currently use Tor + Polipo + Torbutton + NoScript.
Obviously there are other add-ons for Firefox out there such as
BetterPrivacy.
I think 'BetterPrivacy' is a must! [1]
Are any other add-ons necessary or would people suggest I am now fully
On 2010-09-21 07:03, James Brown wrote:
I have changed them for belonging to privoxy but it did not resolve my
problem:
ls -l
-rw-r--r-- 1 privoxy root 50341 2010-09-18 13:00 config
-rw-r--r-- 1 privoxy root 66849 2009-07-06 22:50 default.action
-rw-r--r-- 1 privoxy root 37588 2009-07-06
On 2010-09-20 19:39, James Brown wrote:
OS - Ubuntu 9.10 on a laptop
Privoxy version 3.0.13
Tor version 0.2.1.26
I have installed tor and privoxy and now I have the next problem.
When I boot my system privoxy does not start as daemon and I need to
start it manually (/etc/init.d/privoxy
On 2010-08-16 15:33, via@free.fr wrote:
When I type in the terminal the following line:
---
gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv 886DDD89
---
I get an error telling me the key hasn't been found. I tried to retrieve the
key
from http://keys.gnupg.net/. The key isn't found.
On 2010-07-30 08:27, James Brown wrote:
TB 1.2.5
Today I have the next problem when the TB automatically use the
ixquick.com-engine instead the Google:
'https://ssl.scroogle.org/' works well for me since years.
***
To
On 28.05.2010 06:22, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
DuckDuckGo and Startpage.com are two alternative (specifically to google)
search engines which promise not to record your IP address :
My favorite since many years is: https://ssl.scroogle.org/ (over Tor)
Mike Perry wrote:
I've written a bit more on the reasoning behind these two changes at:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/torbutton-release-125-google-captchas-and-addonsmozillaorg
Access denied
You are not authorized to access this page.
Oops!?
DC wrote:
to start learning and trying it myself i will get a cheap vps to start with.
what's the os version specifically that works best with Tor?
I prefer Ubuntu-server, but Debian is as simple.
Please have a look at: https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian
But beware - on a vps you should
Paul Menzel wrote:
It is a virtual machine ...
Is it safe to say, that it is a client problem that they do not use my
server?
1. On vservers there are many resource limits. Please check: 'cat
/proc/user_beancounters'.
2. Have you read 'http://www.webtropia.com/home/faq.html?article=366'? I
emigrant wrote:
is that possible?
Which question(s) beside 'http://www.privoxy.org/faq/index.html'?
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body.
arshad wrote:
but now i want to disable that deanaimate gif thing. but there isn't a
place in config file to do that :(
The place for personal configuration in privoxy is 'user.action'.
You can append these two lines:
{-deanimate-gifs}
/ # Match all URLs
basile wrote:
If you repeat the above, but go to https://www.google.com (note the
http+s), then the above changes in that the clear http is replaced by
encrypted https. Then even the tor exit node admin can't see your traffic.
It depends on the location of the exit node. I saw changing the
Jim wrote:
The past few days I've noticed that all http requests to
https://ssl.scroogle.org have invariably failed. This appeared as a
DNS failure. After switching over to the regular http (non-ssl)
version of scroogle, I found that was generally working for another
couple of days then that
Brian Mearns wrote:
Is there a way to test that my relay is working? My logs indicate that
ORPort and DirPort are both reachable from the outside, but several
different websites (such as https://torstat.xenobite.eu/) can't find
my relay (nicknamed shallot).
Your relay was working:
Bob Williams wrote:
The uncommented lines in my privoxy config file are:
forward 192.168.*.*/ .
forward-socks4a / 127.0.0.1:9050 .
forward-socks5/ 127.0.0.1:9050 .
To use privoxy without Tor you can add the following line BELOW the
Bob Williams wrote:
To use privoxy without Tor you can add the following line BELOW the
'forward-socks*' lines:
forward/.
Last match wins, see also:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/config.html#FORWARDING
The effect of this would be the same as NOT having the forward-socks*
Roger Dingledine wrote:
Hidden services aren't exactly robust these days though, so the fact
that you couldn't reach the second service is not a huge surprise.
Upgrade to 0.2.1.19 and try again is the best advice I can offer.
Well done! Thank you for that version.
After several days of
leandro noferini wrote:
Now comes the question: is possibile to run the two hidden service on
port 80 together? If I change the above lines in
HiddenServiceDir /var/lib/tor/server-1/
HiddenServicePort 80 127.0.0.1:8183
HiddenServiceDir /var/lib/tor/server-2/
HiddenServicePort 80
Roger Dingledine wrote:
Yes, the portnumber must be unique for the service.
No, it ought to work fine. The 80 is the virtual port, and it only
has to be unique per hidden service.
Typo - sorry. 'Yes' should be 'No'!
Scott Bennett wrote:
Saturday morning, I got the following message.
Jul 25 09:33:57.004 [warn] Received http status code 502 (Proxy
Error) from server '80.190.246.100:80' while fetching consensus directory.
I've got similar messages too, always in conjunction with 'Got a bad
signature
James Brown wrote:
There is a very strong control over telephony in many countries. Many
counties intend to make this control more and more stronger.
In the Russia, when I live, for example the Putin's and Medvedev's
bloody dictatorial regim now intend to ban VoIP telephony:
James Brown wrote:
And what about phone calls, including call to ordinaty telephones?
I use 'ihu' as an alternate for skype, but its a peer-to-peer
application and for Linux only. AFAIK there is no SIP-based VoIP
Software using Tor.
James Brown wrote:
I use 'ihu' as an alternate for skype, but its a peer-to-peer
application and for Linux only. AFAIK there is no SIP-based VoIP
Software using Tor.
Is it possible to call from it to ordinary telephones (insluding mobiles)?
Sorry - no, see also:
Scott Bennett wrote:
So I tried it again, appending .spacecowboy.exit, and can now confirm
that node spacecowboy is indeed returning the error page, rather than
simply returning the SOCKS failure, only this time it said that the name
server said that the domain name doesn't exist, which
Johannes Nitsche wrote:
I am trying to operate a tor bridge on my VPS. The system is an Ubuntu
hardy the tor version is 0.2.0.34 (r18423). I have attached my
configuration file so you can see if there is any error in that one.
Regarding the log files I only see one error reported in them:
In 'git.torproject.org/checkout/tor/master/doc/spec/dir-spec.txt'
ExitNodes are defined as:
Exit -- A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to at
least two of the ports 80, 443, and 6667 and allows exits to at
least one /8 address space.
I would like to setup my ExitNode for
Karsten Loesing wrote:
Feel free to configure your node to exit to those 5 ports only. That
makes your node an exit node for connections to those ports.
Your node won't get the Exit flag, though, but that's not required for
being an exit node. The Exit flag is used by clients for path
Praedor Atrebates wrote:
I just upgraded my linux system to Mandriva 2009.1 and installed tor and tork
as usual. I have tried to configure privoxy as in the past with a forward-
socks4a/localhost:9050 . added at the end of the config file. When privoxy
starts, it produces: Starting
Roger Dingledine wrote:
I have not been able to continuously run tor since 0.2.0.31. EVERY version
since fails to run continuously (0.2.1.7, 0.2.1.8, and now 0.2.1.9). It
starts fine, it runs for a while, then simply stops running without any
error
messages, nothing. It just stops.
Hi,
starting my Tor-Server as a bridge (with a clean /var/lib/tor/) I get:
Dec 28 20:06:03.406 [notice] Tor 0.2.1.9-alpha (r1) opening log file.
Dec 28 20:26:07.562 [warn] Your server (87.122.2.241:9030) has not
managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Please check your
firewalls,
Roger Dingledine wrote:
It's a bug. It's been on my todo list for many months now. It's a
harmless bug, so I haven't gotten around to it.
For now, you can solve it by turning your DirPort off (bridges don't
use dirports). Else continue being patient. :)
Thank you, I will do so.
Scott Bennett wrote:
This entry doesn't work on my server (Picolo) even though the flag
'Directory (v2)' is set.
Why do you believe it doesn't work?
My server is not listed as a HSDir server.
There is, however, the requirement that your
server be up for at least 24 hours before the
Scott Bennett wrote:
## The following line enables hidden service directory mirroring.
HidServDirectoryV2 1
(Or skip the comment line, and just add the second line, as you please.)
Then tell your tor server to reload its torrc file. Within 24 - 25 hours
your server will begin operating as
Any idea what has happened?
--- log of picolo ---
Aug 27 00:31:56.953 [notice] Tor 0.2.1.4-alpha (r16409) opening new log
file.
Aug 27 02:38:35.348 [warn] Got a bad signature on a networkstatus vote
Aug 27 02:38:35.352 [warn] Got a bad signature on a networkstatus vote
Aug 27 02:38:35.356 [warn]
On 2008-08-05 my Tor-Server 'Gypsy' has been shut down by 'ovh.de' -
supposed due to massive violation of their standard form contracts.
No chance to get it back.
Sorry folks.
When I set up my Tor server as a normal relay all works fine:
###
Jun 07 18:16:18.673 [notice] Now checking whether ORPort *.*.*.*:443 and
DirPort *.*.*.*:9030 are reachable... (this may take up to 20 minutes --
look for log messages indicating success)
Jun 07 18:16:24.684 [notice] Self-testing
Roger Dingledine wrote:
---8
May 31 11:53:23.284 [debug] connection_dir_client_reached_eof():
Received response from directory server '*.*.*.*:80': 404 Not found
May 31 11:53:23.285 [info] connection_dir_client_reached_eof(): Received
server info (size 0) from server '*.*.*.*:80'
May 31
When I start my bridge relay on a dedicated server at home, I get this:
---8
May 31 11:34:28.207 [notice] Self-testing indicates your ORPort is
reachable from the outside. Excellent. Publishing server descriptor.
May 31 11:35:37.485 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done.
---8
But after
Roger Dingledine wrote:
---8
May 31 11:53:47.477 [warn] Your server (*.*.*.*:80) has not managed to
confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Please check your firewalls,
ports, address, /etc/hosts file, etc.
---8
Are you running something else on port 80? Like, say, a webserver?
Yes, a
Karsten N. wrote:
http://www.ovh.de/produkte/isgenug.xml
This server has only 256MB RAM. It seems very less for a tor server.
That's true, but traffic is unlimited! :)
My tor servers take 400 - 450MB RAM.
Since I restart Tor on my server (Gypsy2) every midnight, it works fine
with a
Olaf Selke wrote:
http://www.ovh.de/produkte/isgenug.xml
This server has only 256MB RAM. It seems very less for a tor server.
That's true, but traffic is unlimited! :)
100 Mbit/s SLA mit 1000 GB Traffic (anschliessend 5 Mbit/s, sobald der
Grenzwert überschritten wurde)
ODER 100 Mbit/s
kazaam wrote:
And can I setup my Tor-Client that every pc in the lan no matter what IP it
has, can use it?
Remember:
https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#CentralAccessServer
It's a better idea, setting up an independent Tor client on every pc for
increasing privacy -
Andrew Del Vecchio wrote:
Gitano, you rock. It finally works without any error messages! Now one
final thing: It seems that iptables configs are lost when the computer
is shut down. Can I just add this to /etc/rc.d/rc.local, or should it be
initiated earlier in the boot sequence given
kazaam wrote:
Normally I'm using ixquick or seekz but I didn't found something I was
looking for so I went on to google. Of course there came this message telling
me that my question looks like an automated request blabla.., you know what I
mean. But what's new to me was the captcha box
Andrew Del Vecchio wrote:
I got nothing:
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
This works well for me:
---
iptables -t nat -F PREROUTING
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p TCP -i eth0 --dport 443 -j REDIRECT
--to-ports 9001
---
iptables -L -nv
marcel wrote:
AFAIK Strato refused to extend a contract with the CCC, who
operated a TOR-Exitnode there. they also refused to close a
new contract with the CCC.
On 2007-12-11 my contract with Strato was extended for another three months.
Michael Scheinost wrote:
I just want to inform you that the german provider 1blu Ag in Berlin
closed down my tor exit node torpaulianer for violating the contract by
running malicious software.
Same her on 2007-09-10 (Gypsy).
So far I didn't had time to answer them on that, but it looks
58 matches
Mail list logo
