On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> I have started to collect statistics and some of my answers on a wiki page:
> http://www.wiredwings.com/wiki/Torservers.net_Main_Page#Statistics
> So far, there's not been a single real conversation with anyone about the
> legal status.
>
Do
Hi Mike,
Ok, I've updated
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tips-running-exit-node-minimal-harassment
with this information. Let me know if there is anything else you think
might be helpful, too.
Thanks. Will do.
A blog would be great. Another option besides publishing the actual
complaints w
Thus spake Moritz Bartl (t...@wiredwings.com):
> >Please get back to us in a week or so with info on your abuse
> >complaint rate with the new policy. I'll update
> >https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tips-running-exit-node-minimal-harassment
> >with the policy if it does in fact drastically reduce
> As in, MediaSentry doesn't want Tor to exist (for obvious reasons), so
> it DMCA-DoS's new exit nodes?
>
No, they pick on everyone pretty much equally .. easy to do when you're
just using a script to scrape a tracker and complain.
I've investigated many of the complaints over the years, and
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 19:36 -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
> (Though I suspect the SWIP will also help greatly. I am beginning to
> believe that these abuse-bot companies deliberately pick on new
> hosters who do not have their own IP allocation specified to bully
> them off the net).
As in, MediaSentr
I also allow 465 and 563. Those are used by authenticated SMTPS and
NNTPS.
Thanks. I have added them to the exit policy.
Please get back to us in a week or so with info on your abuse
complaint rate with the new policy. I'll update
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tips-running-exit-node-minimal-h
Thus spake Moritz Bartl (t...@wiredwings.com):
> On 27.06.2010 04:17, Mondior Folimun wrote:
> > I also allow 465 and 563. Those are used by authenticated SMTPS and
> > NNTPS.
> > There's also the chat ports: 1863 (MSN), 5190 (aim), 5050 (yahoo), 5222-
> > 5223 (xmpp/gchat). Those haven't given me
Mondior Folimun(mfoli...@elitemail.org)@Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 04:17:15AM +0200:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:49 +0200, "Moritz Bartl"
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Out of curiosity, what exit policy are you now using? Perhaps we
> > > want to standardize on a policy that is effective at reducing these
> >
Hi,
On 27.06.2010 04:17, Mondior Folimun wrote:
> I also allow 465 and 563. Those are used by authenticated SMTPS and
> NNTPS.
> There's also the chat ports: 1863 (MSN), 5190 (aim), 5050 (yahoo), 5222-
> 5223 (xmpp/gchat). Those haven't given me any problems either.
Thanks. I have added them to t
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:49 +0200, "Moritz Bartl"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Out of curiosity, what exit policy are you now using? Perhaps we
> > want to standardize on a policy that is effective at reducing these
> > complaints.
>
> At the moment, I allow ports 20-22,53,79-81,110,143,443,706,873,993,
> 995
Hi,
On 27.06.2010 03:00, Mike Perry wrote:
> Can you post a copy of your counter-notification? Did they say in
> specific why they believe it doesn't meet the requirements?
> Also, are you familiar with chillingeffects? They catalog DMCA-related
> correspondence and provide some legal FAQs for cou
Thus spake Moritz Bartl (t...@wiredwings.com):
> > BayTSP/MediaSentry/etc have heard all the
> > excuses, including when they tagged my printer as serving up movies;
> > they don't care. I fully expect they don't even read the responses, just
> > check that a response was received. The response i
Hi,
> BayTSP/MediaSentry/etc have heard all the
> excuses, including when they tagged my printer as serving up movies;
> they don't care. I fully expect they don't even read the responses, just
> check that a response was received. The response is probably then
> catalogued for some future court
> If you can get SoftLayer to do SWIP on the IP address/range assigned to
> you, that will offload their complaint person and let you handle
> everything automatically.
Agreed. Having the whois info for your TOR box come to you as an
ORG-ABUSE will offload a lot of this from Softlayer. BayTSP,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Jon wrote:
> I don't know if this will help or not, but in the states, my ISP
> provider calls me when they get a complaint. They tell me what the
> complaint was about, I get the ports the issues came thru and what
> they were. All except the last one were Torren
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Out of curiosity, what exit policy are you now using? Perhaps we want
>> to standardize on a policy that is effective at reducing these
>> complaints.
>
> At the moment, I allow ports 20-22,53,79-81,110,143,443,706,873,993,
> 995,8008
Hi,
> Out of curiosity, what exit policy are you now using? Perhaps we want
> to standardize on a policy that is effective at reducing these
> complaints.
At the moment, I allow ports 20-22,53,79-81,110,143,443,706,873,993,
995,8008,8080,. Feel free to suggest others.
> If you've filed the c
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:20:16 +0200
Moritz Bartl wrote:
> All these complaints list pretty much the same Torrents, have been
> issued by MediaSentry or BayTSP, and each offers to get back to them
> on changing email addresses and through a web form. For each single
> abuse case, I have tried to re
Thus spake Moritz Bartl (t...@wiredwings.com):
> After running our 300MBit/s Tor node for less than a week, the US data
> center Softlayer has forced me to limit our exit policy to well-known
> ports after receiving 25 automated Torrent DMCA complaints this weekend
> and again more than 20 in the
Hi,
After running our 300MBit/s Tor node for less than a week, the US data
center Softlayer has forced me to limit our exit policy to well-known
ports after receiving 25 automated Torrent DMCA complaints this weekend
and again more than 20 in the last two days. I hope that now that the
policy is r
20 matches
Mail list logo
