Hi,
I'm using the lates stable release for Mac Os X
I always restricted my exitnode to the UK, by setting strictexitnodes and
having an exitnodes line followed by a list of UK exit nodes names and that
works fine.
Recently I tried
exitnodes {gb}
and Tor cannot connect.
Shouldn&#
On 01/09/2010 10:27 PM, Seth Ness wrote:
> I always restricted my exitnode to the UK, by setting strictexitnodes
> and having an exitnodes line followed by a list of UK exit nodes
> names and that works fine.
It should, there are 24 exit nodes in the UK at last check.
> Also, wher
Thanks.
But is…
exitnodes {gb}
supposed to work also? Because it is not for me.
On Jan 10, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On 01/09/2010 10:27 PM, Seth Ness wrote:
>> I always restricted my exitnode to the UK, by setting strictexitnodes
>> and having an exitnodes lin
Hi all,
considering that I heard from several people that they notice strange
sideeffects since a couple of days - altered webpage, advertisement where no
ads should be - I started a little investigation if there are any obviously
bogus exitnodes in the wild:
http://itnomad.wordpress.com/2006/10
configure & let er run.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Alexander W. Janssen
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 9:33 AM
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Analyzing TOR-exitnodes for anomalies
Hi all,
considering that I heard from
Hi *Alexander W. Janssen* :
> Hi all,
>
> considering that I heard from several people that they notice strange
> sideeffects since a couple of days - altered webpage, advertisement where no
> ads should be - I started a little investigation if there are any obviously
> bogu
e investigation if there are any obviously
>> bogus exitnodes in the wild:
>>
>> http://itnomad.wordpress.com/2006/10/04/analyzing-tor-exitnodes-for-anomalies/
>>
>> I welcome you to start your own investigation; if there are really bogus
>> exitnodes we should be a
uot; must be based on facts
> so I suggest to collect information about this issue here.
My first run during the night was not very successful, most of the exitnodes
refused to talk to me. I'm in timezone GMT+2 and that's pretty normal for that
time of the day, I started anothe
Currently i'm improving my torstat page to mark nodes with bad
http-behavior, using automatic http-throughput comparison of every
http-servicing exit-node against a reference exit-node.
Then it's up to the users to add a ExcludeNodes statement in
torrc using this information.
Greets
Alexand
ons about "bogus exit nodes" must be based on facts
>> so I suggest to collect information about this issue here.
>
> My first run during the night was not very successful, most of the exitnodes
> refused to talk to me. I'm in timezone GMT+2 and that's pretty norm
Hi *glymr* :
> I am not adding anything useful, but I wish to add my feeling about this
> situation that people are so rapidly responding to a threat so early.
>
> :) tor will never die if people like you all are on it. (which reminds
> me i've blathered about writing a dns proxy patch for to
- I started a little investigation if there are any obviously
> bogus exitnodes in the wild:
>
> http://itnomad.wordpress.com/2006/10/04/analyzing-tor-exitnodes-for-anomalies/
>
> I welcome you to start your own investigation; if there are really bogus
> exitnodes we should be aware o
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:31:47PM +0800, Deephay wrote:
> Also, the logo "linux-magazine.com what you need, when you
> need it" is a image or just text?
Exactly the same page is at http://www.wdr.tv/.
The content of that page is (gathered with tcpdump):
http://searchportal.information.com/?a_id
Hi *Alexander W. Janssen* :
Got it !
I was going to this web site: http://www.iamaphex.net
(This is the web site for Torcap, a program to socksify application in Windows
O.S.)
with the exit node exit node: whistlermother
Info: http://node2.xenobite.eu/torstat.php
1195whistlersmother
Hi Claude!
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:29:22AM -0400, Claude LaFrenière wrote:
> Got it !
Aha? I'm still scanning with no result so far, although i found a couple of
exitnodes which have misconfigured local proxies...
[...snip...]
OK, well, i checked that whistlersmother as well and
Greetings!
Been experiencing this particular issue since Sunday & following the topic here.
>From 05-Oct:
exiting from hotmail account
redirected link:
http://g.msn.com/frame.aspx?u=http%3a%2f%2flanding.domainsponsor.com%3fa_id%3d1637%26domainname%3dmsn.com%26adultfilter%3doff%26popunder%3doff
Hi *Stephen* :
> Greetings!
>
> Been experiencing this particular issue since Sunday & following the topic
> here.
>
> From 05-Oct:
>
> exiting from hotmail account
>
> redirected link:
> http://g.msn.com/frame.aspx?u=http%3a%2f%2flanding.domainsponsor.com%3fa_id%3d1637%26domainname%3dmsn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
How can I see which exit node is using?
http://www.debian-administration.org/ was mutilated by exit node into
something similar that you are reporting. Quite alarming trend.
I think that badly behaving exit nodes should be excluded automagically.
>
> Hmmm... I had this problem with Whistlemother exit node and this site:
> http://www.iamaphex.net with the same
> "frame.aspx?u=http%3a%2f%2flanding.domainsponsor.com "blah blah blah"
> filter ... =SUSPECTED+UNDESIRABLE+BOT"
>
i have the same experience using whistlersmother for the same site.
On Friday 06 October 2006 19:21, Robert Hogan wrote:
> > Hmmm... I had this problem with Whistlemother exit node and this site:
> > http://www.iamaphex.net with the same
> > "frame.aspx?u=http%3a%2f%2flanding.domainsponsor.com "blah blah blah"
> > filter ... =SUSPECTED+UNDESIRABLE+BOT"
>
> i have t
Hi *Robert Hogan* :
> On Friday 06 October 2006 19:21, Robert Hogan wrote:
>>> Hmmm... I had this problem with Whistlemother exit node and this site:
>>> http://www.iamaphex.net with the same
>>> "frame.aspx?u=http%3a%2f%2flanding.domainsponsor.com "blah blah blah"
>>> filter ... =SUSPECTED+UND
Hi *M* :
> How can I see which exit node is using?
Check this with Vidalia ...
>
> http://www.debian-administration.org/ was mutilated by exit node into
> something similar that you are reporting. Quite alarming trend.
Please let us remain calm like Norwegian sailors in the storm.
>
>
or advertising.
The exitnodes wich connect to domainsponsor.com are always locate in
US (all US nodes I have seen are located in texas or US without a
more exact description). One Time the exit node was located in DK.
Ive got "url not found" messages with every DE and UK nodes I have
t
ok i have played now for more than an half hour with nonsense
domainnames. every time the connection goes through an exit node
located in texas, one time in the state new york and one time in
denver i have got the advertising page.
maybe it will be a nice test, that someone unsing the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maybe a problem with a DNS- Server?
Greetz
Missi
Eben(am 6. 10. 2006 um 22:26 Uhr)hast du eingetippt:
> ok i have played now for more than an half hour with nonsense
> domainnames. every time the connection goes through an exit node
> located in texa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> How can I see which exit node is using?
>
> Check this with Vidalia ...
Thanks for the info.
>> I think that badly behaving exit nodes should be excluded automagically.
>> How, I dont know =).
>
> For the moment nothings prove that any exit no
bagelcat wrote:
> ok i have played now for more than an half hour with nonsense
> domainnames. every time the connection goes through an exit node located
> in texas, one time in the state new york and one time in denver i have
> got the advertising page.
I remember something about a major DNS ser
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:41, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
> OK, well, i checked that whistlersmother as well and got this picture:
> http://cjoint.com/data/kfr4jmDAsY.htm
I've read or skimmed the entire thread which seems to have ended midday
Thu, 10-5. Friday morning I clicked on a Cnet newslette
Yesterday, I linked to Slashdot and got a bogus page in German.
Restarting my Tor client (i.e., getting a new set of circuits) got me to
the real Slashdot page.
???
Clifnor
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own
Hello,
I don't have Vidalia, so I wasn't able to find out which exit-node I
used, but I found something really interesting. "wiki.noreply.org"
and "wiki.ubuntuusers.de" got replaced by
"http://wiki.noreply.org/frame.aspx?u=http%3a%2f%2flanding.domainsponsor.com%3fa_id%3d1637%26domainname%3dnoreply.
Jan Stolzenburg wrote:
> Hello,
> I don't have Vidalia, so I wasn't able to find out which exit-node I
> used, but I found something really interesting. "wiki.noreply.org"
> and "wiki.ubuntuusers.de" got replaced by
> "http://wiki.noreply.org/frame.aspx?u=http%3a%2f%2flanding.domainsponsor.com%3fa_
yes. I have made more test an seen via vidalia, that the advertising
pages came up when the exit node uses the dns-server NS1 or
NS2.oversee.net (mostly 204.13.161.20 seen).
I´ve made a break now for myself in privoxy, reconfigure it to use
socks4 forwarding instaed of 4a. So I have to live
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Claude LaFrenière @ 2006/10/06 12:24:
> For the moment nothings prove that any exit nodes are responsibles for this.
> We have to do somethings based on facts not fears...
>
How about this then? when navigating to www.ezboard.com the proper page
Hi *Taka Khumbartha* :
> Claude LaFrenière @ 2006/10/06 12:24:
>> For the moment nothings prove that any exit nodes are responsibles for this.
>> We have to do somethings based on facts not fears...
>>
>
> How about this then? when navigating to www.ezboard.com the proper page
> is loa
p.com, etc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Hogan
Sent: July 3, 2007 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Choose exitnodes in country x
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 15:35:21 you wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it would be ni
ter, showmyip.com, etc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Hogan
Sent: July 3, 2007 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Choose exitnodes in country x
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 15:35:21 you wrote:
Hello,
it would be nice to have
s and cat
calls :)
. . .
Wesley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cat Okita
Sent: July 4, 2007 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: RE: Choose exitnodes in country x
Hi Wesley -
I'm going to presume that your ema
On Thursday 05 July 2007 10:32:15 yousifnet wrote:
> > How are you proposing to detect country?
> >
> > no automatic, add an additional entry to the tor directory.
> > For a human there is no problem to get the country out of traceroute.
> > For new tornodes it can be asked direct within the regist
As far as I know the
ExitNodes {..}
feature for determining the countrys exit nationality is currently in alpha
stage.
When will it be stable and released (approx)?
Is it a matter of days/weeks/month/years?
Thank you
Ben
In 'git.torproject.org/checkout/tor/master/doc/spec/dir-spec.txt'
ExitNodes are defined as:
"Exit" -- A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to at
least two of the ports 80, 443, and 6667 and allows exits to at
least one /8 address space.
I w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/09/2009 11:19 AM, Gitano wrote:
> In 'git.torproject.org/checkout/tor/master/doc/spec/dir-spec.txt'
> ExitNodes are defined as:
>
>"Exit" -- A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to at
Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Feel free to configure your node to exit to those 5 ports only. That
> makes your node an exit node for connections to those ports.
>
> Your node won't get the Exit flag, though, but that's not required for
> being an exit node. The Exit flag is used by clients for path s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/09/2009 01:38 PM, Gitano wrote:
>> It's unlikely that the criteria you pasted above will be changed. There
>> need to be some criteria, and if almost every node matches them, the
>> flag would be useless.
>
> Ok, but adding one more 'secure' por
43 matches
Mail list logo
