Re: minimal traffic footprint Tor on the road

2009-09-29 Thread grarpamp
Besides plugging DNS leaks, the two programs serve somewhat different purposes. Indeed, however neither program's purpose is to 'plug dns leaks'. They simply feed what connection [dns] requests they receive on towards Tor. If the user's application this side of the proxy doesn't honor it's own

Re: minimal traffic footprint Tor on the road

2009-09-29 Thread Jim McClanahan
grarpamp wrote: Besides plugging DNS leaks, the two programs serve somewhat different purposes. Indeed, however neither program's purpose is to 'plug dns leaks'. They simply feed what connection [dns] requests they receive on towards Tor. I thought the reason you could not send

Re: minimal traffic footprint Tor on the road

2009-09-29 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 03:29:01AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: If you want to be safe from whatever random app fires [or you fire] up, and all their various requests... run in/behind/under some form of network sandbox that catches all traffic and shoves it through Tor or sinks it. Most decent

minimal traffic footprint Tor on the road

2009-09-28 Thread Eugen Leitl
I've gotten used to connecting to my middleman node on the home LAN so that I don't even know what's the current proper way to run a tor/browser bundle or a browsing appliance on Ubuntu on a netbook (Atom N270) on the road. Which packages to you people use for that? Why? -- Eugen* Leitl a

Re: minimal traffic footprint Tor on the road

2009-09-28 Thread Jan Reister
Il 28/09/2009 15:02, Eugen Leitl ha scritto: I've gotten used to connecting to my middleman node on the home LAN so that I don't even know what's the current proper way to run a tor/browser bundle or a browsing appliance on Ubuntu on a netbook (Atom N270) on the road. Which packages to

Re: minimal traffic footprint Tor on the road

2009-09-28 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 03:17:19PM +0200, Jan Reister wrote: I've gotten used to connecting to my middleman node on the home LAN so that I don't even know what's the current proper way to run a tor/browser bundle or a browsing appliance on Ubuntu on a netbook (Atom N270) on the road.

Re: minimal traffic footprint Tor on the road

2009-09-28 Thread Jan Reister
Il 28/09/2009 15:25, Eugen Leitl ha scritto: Why the switch to Polipo from Privoxy? Is Privoxy officially deprecated now? I just found out today and am wondering myself. From hearsay, Polipo should perform faster and better. There are no tor/browser appliances for Ubuntu out yet, right? I'm

Re: minimal traffic footprint Tor on the road

2009-09-28 Thread Jim McClanahan
Jan Reister wrote: Il 28/09/2009 15:25, Eugen Leitl ha scritto: Why the switch to Polipo from Privoxy? Is Privoxy officially deprecated now? I just found out today and am wondering myself. From hearsay, Polipo should perform faster and better. There was a somewhat extended discussion

Re: minimal traffic footprint Tor on the road

2009-09-28 Thread Flamsmark
It's my experience that Polipo provides for faster proxying than Privoxy (running both on a recent Ubuntu). However, Polipo is not uniformly stable on Windows. I use Privoxy with local Tor instances on Windows, but Polipo on Ubuntu. On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 18:00, Jim McClanahan