OT: X server on Win NT

http://www.linuxnetmag.com/en/issue5/m5xserver1.html JP -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Jan Pruner INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access /

Re: SSL and non-SSL requests on same Apache server in 9iAS?

Read section 2.2 of Note 123718.1. Hemant K Chitale Principal DBA Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd Ben Poels [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/03/2002 06:03 AM Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please respond to ORACLE-L

RE: EXTENTS?

you create the db (although I heard that different tablespaces can have different Db Block sizes in 9i - correct anybody?) yep I've even tested it :) --- Mercadante, Thomas F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seema, You got it backwards. If Db Block Size is 8k, and you create a table with

RE: Secret maximum for INITRANS?

Robert, I guess you are looking in 'itc' in block dumps which shows the ITL Count. And yes.. There is an upper bound for number of ITLs based on the block size. The transaction slots (and other headers) can not use the more than 50% of the space available for data in the data block. Each ITL

RE: EXTENTS?

sigh... someone shoot me. I am spending WAY too much time being unemployed these days. extents are made up of blocks. now I'll shut up before I embarrass myself anymore :) Rachel --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and I was off as well, if your extent size is less than the blocksize

Re: # of datafiles per tablespace

no reason. I can see creating multiple files under those conditions only because you want to keep files to a specific size. Now, I did once find that the rollback datafiles were a bottleneck on a system I had. So we built TWO rollback tablespaces, with datafiles on different mount points etc and

RE: Names server

We use Oracle Names big time. Our approach is to keep using it until it *really* does not come on the Install CD. It will be a mistake to get rid of something that has now stabilized very well. - Kirti -Original Message- Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 4:29 PM To: Multiple recipients of

RE: # of datafiles per tablespace

That being said is there anything wrong with having one 4G data file for a tablespace. I personally cannot think of any. There were the days when 2G was the limit but that sure isn't the case anymore. The only thing I can think of is for backups. However, I am always going to backup on at

RE: # of datafiles per tablespace

Other than I/O load balancing.. I can't see any other reason. But again, why those tiny 50MB files? Are these on the same disk? I hope not.. If there is no I/O bottleneck issues, I would build just one 700MB file. And then monitor how it works out.. - Kirti -Original Message-

Oracle 9i upgrade exam.

Dear all, I want to prepare my self for oracle 9i upgrade exam . Much appreciated If anyone can tell me any sites or books for the preparation of this exam, Regards Chuan -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Chuan Zhang INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat

RE: # of datafiles per tablespace

In a UNIX system it is better to have more small size datafiles than a few or one large datafile: The reason is that UNIX aquires an exclusive file write lock and therefore if you use multiple files you will avoid a situation where multiple simultaneous writes to data files become serialized and

Re: Names server

Hi All, Following is my observation on UNIX Server. Except for this CLIENT Connections and individual connections from around the world and servers work without any problems. Just to add.. With Names Server life and management is easy... - This test was performed with

RE: Oracle 9i upgrade exam.

Try this site http://www.oracle-base.com/Articles/9i/Articles9i.asp -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 9:33 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject:Oracle 9i upgrade exam. Dear all, I want to prepare my self for oracle 9i upgrade exam . Much

RE: Read Consistency ITL's

Rajesh, Other than the Transaction ID,UBA and Commit SCN (or csc.. Cleanout System Change) there is something called 'lock byte' in the ITL entry. THis gives the details about the locked (!!) rows. I have dumped few blocks and have an half written note with me which explains the lock byte and

RE: # of datafiles per tablespace

If it were a data or an index tablespace, laying out a tablespace across multiple datafiles could help in striping data or partitioning. And as Kirti said, could be to balance the I/O across multiple disks. Raj

RE: # of datafiles per tablespace

And yeah!!! Restore. Imagine the loss on one datafile of 700 Mb, and one of 50Mb. Raj Rajesh Rao

Re: Clash of the DBs in eWeek

Hi, I have also an other question. Do you you why they did not test postgressql ? Regards Henrik -- --- E-mail :[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jesse, Rich wrote: -!-Anybody happen to see the cover story on

Re: Names server

Hi, Works fine for us on Solaris 8 Oracle 8.1.7 20 Dbs in the Nameserver. Regards Henrik E. -- On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Yahoo wrote: -!-Hi ALL: -!-Is any one using names server out there? How the it works? Any -!-infor are wellcome. -!- -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:

RE: Does Oracle 9iAS only run on Apache?

Well. you could look at Note 134284.1 on MetaLink. I've never tried iAS with anything other than Oracle's Apache distribution so I can't say if this document suffices. [You could also look at Note 132466.1 on the Oracle Plug-In for IIS to run Oracle PLSQL applications through IIS. Again,

Oracle 9i on windows Advance Server is not starting Automatically

We have a small problem. Oracle has been installed on Windows Advanced Server. Other software on the system include Microsoft Cluster Server. Oracle software has been installed on the local drive (E:) using silent installation. Database has been installed on Shared Disk (RAID) (D:) using

<    1   2