Hi Tim
Tony Jambu here. Saw your posting to Oracle-l with regards
to your sp_vmstat.sh script. I am not sure if know but
I write a regular hints & tips column for Select Journal.
I read your article and would like to mention your script and
point people to the script. Do you mind if I mention it
Thanks for sharing that Pete
ta
tony
At 02:39 AM 24/10/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>>>So who found out this vulnerability? David Litchfield? Aaron Newman?
>>>I know it is a bit silly to ask but does anyone know how
>>>to exploit this vulnerability? Send it to me directly if you dont want to
>>>reply
Hi Mike
Here it is again. Let me know if you can read it.
ta
tony
At 08:54 AM 23/10/2003 -0800, Vergara, Michael (TEM) wrote:
Tony:
I did not receive the attachment
clearly. Can you re-send it
or cite the source?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
Important: Please read the following Oracle Alert.
We strongly recommend that you do not connect
the Oracle Database
directly to the Internet.
Got your attention? That is what is in the Alert.
These alerts are beginning
to come all too often. Sounds just like Microsoft's software,
yeah?
Buffe
ation on the site
>but am not getting any email from them.
>
>I need to try something out in the next day and would appreciate
>it if someone could provide me with an account and passw**d
>to upload my files.
>
>If you are so kind as to let me have yours, you can send it
Juan
I have the URL that you can get a copy from but you
need access to Oracle's network. Wrote about it in Select
Journal.
In 1999 - I wrote:
DUL - Data recovery
UnLoader
DUL or Data recovery
UnLoader is a utility that that will generate either a data file or an
Oracle Export file by reading
passw**d
to upload my files.
If you are so kind as to let me have yours, you can send it
to me directly at tjambu_fatcity @ yahoo.com.au(Remove spaces)
Thanks
to
tony
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network
Hi Juan
For which platform do you want it for?
Not saying I have it! ;-)
ta
tony
At 12:19 AM 17/09/2003 -0800, Juan Miranda wrote:
We need
to extract the data of a datafile directly, because we don´t
have
the rest of the database (other tablespaces,
controlfile, etc).
Are there some utility lik
Hi there
In the past few weeks, there have been lots of discussion about HA, data
replication
and using Shareplex, dataguard, Streams, logical & physical
standby. As most of you
have found out each has it own pros and cons. You also need two
sets of Database licences
and Shareplex licences. Th
Spoke to Pete last week. he has been on leave and in the process
of finding his way in his new office. He is back in Oz.
Do you have his email address?
ta
tony
At 10:29 AM 16/08/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>Anyone hear anything out of Pete Sharman in the last two weeks? If you see
>or hear from hi
hi object/relational developers
Please bear with me if I am not using the right terminology.
Am intending on using java to access to the underlying relational tables.
Was thinking of exposing the database to java using Object views over the relational
views.
Trying to isolate the complexity of
Hi Jared
Was that a cluster of Sun E15ks or A single E15K of clustered domains
within itself?
The reason I mention the E12k and HP Superdome was that the equipment
is already available. All I need is to purchase additional CPUS.
I am trying to enquire as to what people have commissioned
with 1
Thanks matt
Understand where you are coming from. But one of my issue is the
performance required to carry out batch extracts. If RAC was able to
slice the job up and share it across all nodes, that would be great
ala Oracle10G (wont go there now).
WRT to TCO - RAC on Linux on Intel is the o
Hi Jared
Yes I have read his article and also Dave Ensor's thoughts in it.
I personally am not convinced and am looking for reasons why I should
go with RAC other than fault tolerance given the risk involve in being
one of the 1st few genuine pigs.
I probably say, I would go with single instanc
Stephen
I agree with your comments re scalability vs fault tolerance.
Actually the configuration I am looking at is 16 CPUS. So it
is either one domain (vertical) of 16 CPUS or
4 nodes of 4 CPUs each or
2 nodes of 8 CPUS each.
And on top of this I have to cater for a Standby environment as well.
Hi All
I would like to ask for your thoughts on whether to RAC or just go
vertical (more cpu)
Background
Txn - OLTP like txn during day but batch extracts at night and
very big
batch extract periodically
Data Volume - 5-10 TByte
Data volatility - 99 % of data is very much like a ware hous
Also
AUSOUG (Australian OUG)
www.ausoug.org
ta
tony
At 08:04 AM 09/06/2003 -0800, you wrote:
While not trying to
sound like this is coming off like a shameless plug, because it isn't...
I have an Apps book going to publisher in a couple weeks and
they want to do PR. To that end, they have ask
Hi all
I have a question which is probably easy for some of you
but it is 21:00 and my mind is not working. Would appreciate
it if someone can point me in the right direction. version is 8i
so no ANSI OUTER JOIN.
I have 4 tables:
master_tab, ID is PK
detail_tab_A, ID is FK
detail_tab_B
Hi all
For those that are running or intending on running Oracle on
Intel's Xeon CPU, the following information may be of interest to you.
The Xeon CPU has a feature called Hyper Threading with double the number
of registers. This feature when turned will present to the Operating
Systems an ad
Hi Kip
I think you got the gist of it.
In regards to your Q on DR, I assume that SunGuard and IBM is
a DR facility hosted by them. How would you be recovering your
database?
Tapes? Then that should be OK.
Filesystem replication or one of Oracle's features? Then you have to
get another set
Hi Rachel
Good to hear from you. I am always on the list. Just
being
a lurker.
I am surprise that you are paying for a standby if the standby
DB is not being used at the same time as the Pri.
By standby, do you mean something like Oracle replication or
Dataguard
where you are using Oracle's ut
Ethan
This 10 day grace only applies to Clusters/Failovers not Standbys.
So unless your DR is in a Global Cluster you can't apply the
10 days grace.
As for a Hot standby DR site where the server is larger than the
Primary server, I would think it reasonable to pay for the size
of the Primary. B
Tom
At 05:14 AM 16/01/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>Jared,
>
>why doesn't it seem right?
Because if you use filesystem replication, the standby/DR server
does not have Oracle up and running. Oracle does not come
into the equation at all.
ta
tony
_ / |Tony Jambu, Database&Web
Hi Jared
I have a reply from someone who does not want to be identified.
This is his case.
His company tried reasoning and discussing it with Oracle
and even tried a compromised (which I would not be happy with)
He company put forward to Oracle to pay for the full licence
on the production serve
Hi All
For those sites with either a standby, DR or failover database,
the following information is very important to you. You could be in
breach of Oracle's Licensing agreement and could cost you $100,000s
if not millions $$
(Read the summary at the end if you want to skip the
details)
In the
25 matches
Mail list logo
