I'm running Oracle on Linux both at home and in the office.
I work for Wang Trading, a small brokerage firm from Norwalk, CT.
I cannot get into the specifics, but Oracle is used primarily for
data warehousing purposes.
On 2003.09.14 13:04, Ryan wrote:
Are many people running Oracle on Lin
Are many people running Oracle on Linux? I havent
seen it anywhere myself. If so what flavors? Is there much difference between
administering on Say Redhat vs. Solaris? I know 'oracle' itself is the same, but
any of the OS-Database interaction different?
Im thinking about throw
in,
Patrice JSent: 24 July 2003 13:34To: Multiple recipients
of list ORACLE-LSubject: Oracle on linux vs. on
windows
I
found this item on the 'net this morning:
http://rootprompt.org/article.php3?article=5475
Patrice.
There is a marketing term in the USA (at least) called "bait and switch".
"Yeah, sure! We have Linux. Here, take a look at our Linux."
"But, while you are doing that, you might as well look at AIX."
-Original Message-
Heh-heh, Burleson talking about running Oracle on WINE and IBM drop
running Oracle on WINE
> and IBM dropping AIX..
>
> What a joke...
>
> Tanel.
> - Original Message -
> From: Boivin, Patrice J
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:34 PM
> Subject: Oracle on linux vs. on windows
y 24, 2003 3:34 PM
Subject: Oracle on linux vs. on windows
I found this item on the 'net this morning:
http://rootprompt.org/article.php3?article=5475
Patrice.
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Ron Rogers
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Net
: Oracle on linux vs. on
windows
I
found this item on the 'net this morning:
http://rootprompt.org/article.php3?article=5475
Patrice.
Title: Extproc setup Q?
I
found this item on the 'net this morning:
http://rootprompt.org/article.php3?article=5475
Patrice.
Redhat 9.0
-Original Message-
Sent: 23 June 2003 13:11
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Oh boy, you are going to have the time of your life. Which version of RH
are you about to install? Is it 8.0, 9 or AS? Workstation installation
should
be fine.
On 2003.06.23 06:54, John Dunn
I haven't found a similar white paper yet but I found one titled:
"Tips: Instal & configure Red Hat Linux Advanced server 2.1 for
Oracle9IAS 9.0.2 and above" It lists the recommended steps to configure
the server and states the package group to use. I lists the :Advanced
Server" option to be used.I
Hi,
I just installed RH9 and Oracle 9i R2 on my home PC and it installs fine if
you follow the instructions in the following URL
http://codah.net/install-oracle9iR2-on-redhat9.html
(was my first venture into RH also)
I choose the server version.
Mind you Oracle is only certified on RH AS/ES 2
Oh boy, you are going to have the time of your life. Which version of RH
are you about to install? Is it 8.0, 9 or AS? Workstation installation should
be fine.
On 2003.06.23 06:54, John Dunn wrote:
OK, I am about to venture into the world of Red Hat Linuxand then
install Oracle on it.
I have
OK, I am about to venture into the world of Red Hat Linuxand then
install Oracle on it.
I have a question re the Linux install options. Do I need to do a "Server
installation" (as opposed to a "Personal Desktop installation" or a
"Workstation installation"), to be able to later install Oracle
One of the SAs here has asked my to find out if Oracle is supported on Linix on Sparc
hardware. He is specifically interested in 9i versions. With him standing over my
shoulder, I looked on Metalink, and could not find anything that indicates this
specific a combination. Has anyone tried this
Is it Certified ?
For Setup & Performance Tuning - Any Links , Docs ?
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: VIVEK_SHARMA
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing lis
d one needs an expert to do so, otherwise,
> > > only
> > > KDE is
> > >left.
> > > 6) SuSE has memory test as one of the booting options which was an
> > > extremely
> > >
> > >convenient thing when I was installing additional me
gt; > extremely
> >
> >convenient thing when I was installing additional memory and my DIMM
was
> > bad.
> > 7) The latest RH betas are done with gcc 3.1 which is an official gcc
> > release.
> >As soon as that hits production, I'm switching back to RH, especiall
n official gcc
> > release.
> > As soon as that hits production, I'm switching back to RH, especially
> > now
> > when
> >RH and Oracle Corp. resolved their differences.
> >
> > Mladen Gogala
> > Oracle DBA
> > Phone: (203) 459-6855
gt; now
> when
>RH and Oracle Corp. resolved their differences.
>
> Mladen Gogala
> Oracle DBA
> Phone: (203) 459-6855
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> &g
nd Oracle Corp. resolved their differences.
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
Phone: (203) 459-6855
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 4:10 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
&
-- Christopher Royce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/22/02 08:53:32 -0800
> Have been unable to arrive at a definitive position
There isn't one. There are tradeoffs between the two distro's.
Most of it comes down to which one you are more comfortable
with or which one does more things (including th
Have been unable to arrive at a definitive position regarding the question
of 'which is the preferred distribution of Linux vis-à-vis Oracle'. I
have inherited Suse Oracle Implementations which are Oracle Corp. certified
and have had little or no problems. There are other Red Hat (non-Oracle)
>>> Mailer Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/16/02 16:41 PM >>>
The destination address you specified for your message could not be
reached because of a locking problem. Your message is being returned to
you so that you can resend it if you desire. The locking problem should
be resolved within a few
2 12:08 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: Oracle on Linux ... Production Strength ???
>
>
>
>
> Christopher Royce wrote:
> >
> > Need Input:
> >
> > I would like to solicit real life experiences, educated
> opinions, ac
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 07:28:23AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Not a "honeymoon" issue, just that Linux progresses much
The Oracle support matrix says SuSE 7.2 and RH 7.1. RH flagged
in the scheme about the time RH announced entry into the db
market with it's PostgreSQL port. Call i
-- Ray Stell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/15/02 06:38:28 -0800
> The support matrix at metalink includes other distributions,
> and does not include RH7.2, only the antique 7.1. I have
> to conclude that the ora/rh honeymoon is over. They did
> just add Red Hat 2.1 Advanced Server to the 9i ma
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 08:18:24AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... and Oracle only supports Red Hat so that
> is probably what you'll end up with.
--
The support matrix at metalink includes other distributions,
and does not include RH7.2, only the antique 7.1. I have
to conclude that the
-- "James J. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/13/02 21:08:18 -0800
> By thw way, my preferred Distro is Mandrake. (Bear in mind that RedHat was
> [and may still be] compiled to run on an 80386. Most modern CPU's have
> additional features that you have to compile your software to use. Mandr
Christopher Royce wrote:
>
> Need Input:
>
> I would like to solicit real life experiences, educated opinions, accolades
> and criticisms from those of you who have implemented or are considering
> implementing Oracle on Linux in a business critical production enviro
> We are considering both Red Hat and Suse distributions. We have discovered
> that regardless of the Linux distribution support is generally
> expensive. That is not a particularly 'deal breaker' determining factor ..
> BUT .. I question the quality of support, the expediency of response an
Need Input:
I would like to solicit real life experiences, educated opinions, accolades
and criticisms from those of you who have implemented or are considering
implementing Oracle on Linux in a business critical production environment.
We are considering both Red Hat and Suse distributions
Regarding chattr and changing atime updates on Oracle database files...
here's the response I got from Oracle support:
-
UPDATE:
According to "man chattr":
When a file with the 'A' attribute set is modified, its atime record
Hi Steve. I also see your point, of course, and it's often a fine line
to tread. However, if making something well tuned were a simple case of
plugging in numbers, it would already be configured that way. Of course,
some defaults are plain silly! The reality is, and the point behind my
objections,
Thanks James.
OK, now I see where you're coming from... like the esteemed published author
that you are, you're wanting a complete treatise on Oracle database tuning.
:-) But my sense was that the article was merely addressing quick and dirty
tuning options or "low hanging fruit" as the author pu
Hi Steve,
>
>
> > The author is also misinformed about the workings of the
> log buffer,
> > and
> > the interaction of Oracle blocksize with the filesystem block size.
>
> I didn't see any discussion of this in the article. ?
This is two separate issues: a) log buffer - this was discusse
002 12:33
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Oracle on Linux articles
>
>
>
> "Linux Maximus, Part 1: Gladiator-like Oracle Performance" -
> http://www.linuxjournal.com//article.php?sid=> 5840
>
> "Linux
> Maximus, Part 2: th
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Marin Dimitrov
> Sent: 12 March 2002 12:33
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Oracle on Linux articles
>
>
>
> "Linux Maximus, Part 1: Gladiator-like Oracle Performance" -
> http://www.linuxjourn
L PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Marin Dimitrov
> Sent: 12 March 2002 12:33
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Oracle on Linux articles
>
>
>
> "Linux Maximus, Part 1: Gladiator-like Oracle Performance" -
> http://www.linuxjournal.com//artic
"Linux Maximus, Part 1: Gladiator-like Oracle Performance" -
http://www.linuxjournal.com//article.php?sid=5840
"Linux Maximus, Part 2: the RAW Facts on Filesystems" -
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=5841
(the discussions after the articles are quite interesting too)
hth,
Mari
each please...
stability, performance, management, etc...
for small scale oracle financials implementation
(125 users max)
and what would be the best and most reliable linux distribution to use.
on Compaq proliant hardware
no experience on oracle on linux but with experience with NT (very
pros and cons of each please...
stability, performance, management, etc...
for small scale oracle financials implementation
(125 users max)
and what would be the best and most reliable linux distribution to use.
on Compaq proliant hardware
no experience on oracle on linux but with experience
Hi
root.sh will update the env files (located under
/usr/local/bin). I think it is a good idea to take them backup before
applying root.sh (Solaris 2.7)
Earlier in one installation, we got this same situation. We were to
restore them from a different server that has the same environment
Sorry, sorry, sorry.
Our admin didn't run root.sh during install process.
Everything goes well. :-)
Thanks.
JP
On Sat 8. December 2001 20:25, you wrote:
> Hello,
> a "little" problem during installing Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux.
> I was installing 817 and I didn't let the installer create database
Hello,
a "little" problem during installing Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux.
I was installing 817 and I didn't let the installer create database.
So, I'd let dbassist create scripts and I'm trying run it.
When I start svrmgrl, I get ORA-12545: TNS:name lookup failure error
=> I cannot "connect internal"
Hi,
Thank you for your help.
The problem is I can't download the 1.1.8 Java from www.blackdown.org
because every link responds with 'Server not available' or something like this.
Can you send it to my e-mail address? ( [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thank you very much
Zsolt Csillag,
Hungary
At 09:56 200
Csillag Zsolt
rware.hu>cc:
Sent by: Subject: I still can't install Oracle on
Linux - help
Hi,
I have the following environment:
Suse 7.1, Oracle 8.1.6, 256 Mb Ram, KDE, Java runtime (I hope I installed
it correctly).
When I run the Installer from Kde, it makes nothing, but if I run from
terminal window
I get a very long list ended by an OK.
I'm going to paste below the whole messag
I have had good luck with Red Hat Linux 6.2 and Oracle 8.1.6.1 for Linux.
You don't need
to do any upgrades to Linux before installing Oracle, you don't have to
download your own Java virtual machine, and you don't have to install any
Oracle patches to make it work (as I had to with Oracle 8.1.5).
48 matches
Mail list logo
