RE: Freelist Contention - PQ slaves

2001-08-21 Thread Johnson Poovathummoottil
What happens when you join a large parllelized table with a very small table (contained in just 10 or 12 blocks) the retrieval of rows from the large table looks up the small table causing buffer busy waits on the blocks of the small table. Keeping the small table in keep pool removes the buffer b

RE: Freelist Contention - PQ slaves

2001-08-21 Thread Gogala, Mladen
Another thing that comes to mind is incorrectly tuned DBWR, which cannot keep up. > -Original Message- > From: Deshpande, Kirti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:31 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: RE: Freelist Content

RE: Freelist Contention - PQ slaves

2001-08-21 Thread Koivu, Lisa
Title: RE: Freelist Contention - PQ slaves I thought that parallel query slaves were smart enough to divide up the work between them so there was no overlap?  What am I missing?  Can you elaborate? -Original Message- From:   Johnson Poovathummoottil [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent