ions and statements above are entirely my own and not those of my
employer or clients **
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremiah Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:30 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Making dispatchers
respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora?
Well, my first objection to ONames was just in the context of solving
my problem. Dispatchers cac
list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora?
>
>
> Not that ONames doesn't have it's shortcomings, but I'm not
> sure how ONames
> is a single point of failure. Even in our little 35-alias
> ONames repository
> with only the root reg
Well, my first objection to ONames was just in the context of solving
my problem. Dispatchers cache addresses for outgoing connections,
whether they cache them from tnsnames.ora or ofrom Oracle Names. Or
so I understand it. If someone knows differently about Names then I
would like to hear about
Not that ONames doesn't have it's shortcomings, but I'm not sure how ONames
is a single point of failure. Even in our little 35-alias ONames repository
with only the root region, we have a secondary Names Server. With local
checkpoint files, the repository is not required for continuous access, s
ronment,
so I'm not following what you're referring to.
Jared
Jeremiah Wilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/30/2003 08:10 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subje
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Gogala, Mladen wrote:
> Yeah! Put it in Oracle*Names.
Will it make a difference? Does a dispatcher really re-query Names
every time it tries to make a connection? No caching of service
addresses? You promise?
Off I go to convert my 300-instance organization to rely on a s
Yeah! Put it in Oracle*Names.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremiah Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:49 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora?
>
>
> Dispatchers and job queue processes read t