RE: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora?

2003-01-31 Thread John Kanagaraj
ions and statements above are entirely my own and not those of my employer or clients ** > -Original Message- > From: Jeremiah Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:30 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: RE: Making dispatchers

RE: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora?

2003-01-31 Thread Stephen Evans
respond to ORACLE-L                 To:        Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:                 Subject:        RE: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora? Well, my first objection to ONames was just in the context of solving my problem.  Dispatchers cac

RE: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora?

2003-01-30 Thread John Kanagaraj
list ORACLE-L > Subject: RE: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora? > > > Not that ONames doesn't have it's shortcomings, but I'm not > sure how ONames > is a single point of failure. Even in our little 35-alias > ONames repository > with only the root reg

RE: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora?

2003-01-30 Thread Jeremiah Wilton
Well, my first objection to ONames was just in the context of solving my problem. Dispatchers cache addresses for outgoing connections, whether they cache them from tnsnames.ora or ofrom Oracle Names. Or so I understand it. If someone knows differently about Names then I would like to hear about

RE: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora?

2003-01-30 Thread Jesse, Rich
Not that ONames doesn't have it's shortcomings, but I'm not sure how ONames is a single point of failure. Even in our little 35-alias ONames repository with only the root region, we have a secondary Names Server. With local checkpoint files, the repository is not required for continuous access, s

RE: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora?

2003-01-30 Thread Jared . Still
ronment, so I'm not following what you're referring to. Jared Jeremiah Wilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/30/2003 08:10 AM Please respond to ORACLE-L To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subje

RE: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora?

2003-01-30 Thread Jeremiah Wilton
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Gogala, Mladen wrote: > Yeah! Put it in Oracle*Names. Will it make a difference? Does a dispatcher really re-query Names every time it tries to make a connection? No caching of service addresses? You promise? Off I go to convert my 300-instance organization to rely on a s

RE: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora?

2003-01-30 Thread Gogala, Mladen
Yeah! Put it in Oracle*Names. > -Original Message- > From: Jeremiah Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:49 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: Making dispatchers re-read tnsnames.ora? > > > Dispatchers and job queue processes read t