On 2003.10.27 00:34, Mogens Nørgaard wrote:
I have this radical idea that Oracle should include RAC in SE at no extra
price (I think that would spread the product fast :) ),
That would, quite likely, be the end of RAC. RAC is a great tool for those who
need it, but it's far too complex for
Mladen, Mogens - If Oracle were to slash prices, there are several factors
to consider. First, what does that do to Oracle's bottom line? Would sales
increase dramatically enough to keep overall revenue from falling? I think
the stagnant economy over the last few years has been tough on everyone
I believe that Red Hat would be much better acquisition target then
PeopleSoft. First of all, Peoplesoft doesn't seem to like the idea,
second, Peoplesoft is very expensive. Red Hat would be much cheaper
and would help oracle branch into other areas, where they could
bundle database in a
And this is a good thing?
;)
-Original Message-
Mladen Gogala
Sent: 27 October 2003 14:24
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I believe that Red Hat would be much better acquisition target then
PeopleSoft. First of all, Peoplesoft doesn't seem to like the idea,
second, Peoplesoft
I remember reading something about this a couple of years ago. Another
Larry pipe-dream. That he would keep developing the Rdbms-kernel so that he
didn't need the any op-systems.
If you think about it, the Rdbms is close to being it's own op-system. It
provides a service on a machine
Hi All
oracle taking over redhat...makes lotta of
sense...actually..
Redhat ProductsOracle Products
Redahat DatabaseOracle Database
Redhat collabration suite oracel collab
suite
Redhat Devlopement env Oracle ids
Redhat strongholdweb
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mogens Nørgaard
Sent: 27 October 2003 05:34
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
You had everybody convinced by your speach down there in
South
of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:19 PM
-Original Message-
From: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 October 2003 12:44
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is MSEE
-Original Message-
From: Rothouse, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 27 October 2003 00:04
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Oracle pricing ain't going down
I realized in my hasty response that I failed to complete my
thought/question. My
[ .. snip snip ..]
Sorry, correcting my own transposition
(a
page in SS2000 is eight 8kB extents)
That should have read an extent is eight 8kB pages in SS2000.
I'll go back to my cave, now.
Ciao
Fuzzy
:-)
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Grant
Of Ryan
Sent: 23 October 2003 00:29
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is the microsoft,. sybase, and ibm database pricing?
anyone know the differences in prices?
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL
out there. Std Edition One
pricing is what Std Edition should be selling at IMO.
Niall
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: 23 October 2003 00:29
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going
You forgot No Unix.
-Original Message-
Here's a start. MSSQLServer EE has ...
No bitmap indexes, no partitioned indexes, no function-based
indexes, no domain indexes, no reverse key indexes, no object
tables, no before triggers (can be kludged, not pretty), no
multiple
-Original Message-
From: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 October 2003 12:44
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is MSEE lacking in?
sound of can of worms opening
Here's a start. MSSQLServer EE has ...
No bitmap
: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 October 2003 12:44
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is MSEE lacking in?
sound of can of worms opening
Here's a start. MSSQLServer EE has ...
No bitmap indexes
12:44
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is MSEE lacking in?
sound of can of worms opening
Here's a start. MSSQLServer EE has ...
No bitmap indexes, no partitioned indexes, no function-based indexes,
no
domain indexes
ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is MSEE lacking in?
sound of can of worms opening
Here's a start. MSSQLServer EE has ...
No bitmap indexes, no partitioned indexes, no function-based indexes,
no
domain indexes, no reverse key indexes, no object tables
ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is MSEE lacking in?
sound of can of worms opening
Here's a start. MSSQLServer EE has ...
No bitmap indexes, no partitioned indexes, no function-based indexes,
no
domain indexes, no reverse key indexes, no object
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:19 PM
-Original Message-
From: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 October 2003 12:44
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is MSEE lacking in?
sound
And this surprises you???
Thank You
Stephen P. Karniotis
Technical Alliance Manager
Compuware Corporation
Direct: (313) 227-4350
Mobile: (248) 408-2918
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:www.compuware.com
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 5:24 PM
To: Multiple
NO, not really, but I was hoping based on Uncle Larry's statements. Lets put it this
way, IF we could get a site license from Oracle (As Uncle Larry defined it) for the
same price per year, or less, as our current support contract the discussions about
SQL*Server and PostGreSql would come to a
] On
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: 23 October 2003 00:29
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is the microsoft,. sybase, and ibm database pricing?
anyone know the differences in prices?
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list
Edition One
pricing is what Std Edition should be selling at IMO.
Niall
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: 23 October 2003 00:29
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
.
Niall
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: 23 October 2003 00:29
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is the microsoft,. sybase, and ibm database pricing
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is the microsoft,. sybase, and ibm database pricing?
anyone know the differences in prices?
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 5:24 PM
http
be selling at IMO.
Niall
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: 23 October 2003 00:29
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is the microsoft,. sybase, and ibm database pricing
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: 23 October 2003 00:29
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is the microsoft,. sybase, and ibm database pricing?
anyone know
-Original Message-
From: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 October 2003 12:44
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is MSEE lacking in?
sound of can of worms opening
Here's a start. MSSQLServer EE has
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle pricing ain't going down
what is MSEE lacking in?
sound of can of worms opening
Here's a start. MSSQLServer EE has ...
No bitmap indexes, no partitioned indexes, no function-based indexes, no
domain indexes, no reverse key indexes
what is the microsoft,. sybase, and ibm database pricing?
anyone know the differences in prices?
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 5:24 PM
30 matches
Mail list logo
