To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: RE: CBO, RBO and will v5 ever really go away?
>
> Unfortunately, our applications fall into the second category. And due to
> the complexity of the queries being run, attempting to turn on CBO also
> activates
PM 02:54:25 EDT
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: RE: CBO, RBO and will v5 ever really go away?
>
> Didn't I mention that? Bug 2954921... simple query blows away one of
their
> internal views. Here's a snippet of t
is that the correct number? its not on metalink.
>
> From: "Bellow, Bambi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/10/20 Mon PM 02:54:25 EDT
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: RE: CBO, RBO and will v5 ever really go a
le recipients of list ORACLE-L
what is the bug?
>
> From: "Bellow, Bambi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/10/20 Mon PM 02:04:26 EDT
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: RE: CBO, RBO and will v5 ever really go away?
what is the bug?
>
> From: "Bellow, Bambi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/10/20 Mon PM 02:04:26 EDT
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: RE: CBO, RBO and will v5 ever really go away?
>
> Unfortunately, our
Unfortunately, our applications fall into the second category. And due to
the complexity of the queries being run, attempting to turn on CBO also
activates a bug for which Oracle has a fix in v10.1 but will not do a
backport, and so, until we are ready to go to 10.1, we are stuck with RBO,
and bec
generally speaking there are two groups of people using the RBO.
1. The DBAs who have been around for 15 years and doesnt read release notes and doesnt
feel the need to read release notes or documentation because he knows everything. He
may have tried the CBO in 1995 and had 1-2 bad experiences.
