PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/10/02 Thu PM 12:34:33 EDT
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Physical I/O and databases other than oracle
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 11:44, Garry Gillies wrote:
Im reading an academic book on databases and it states that
Physical I/O
: DENNIS WILLIAMS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/10/06 Mon AM 09:34:25 EDT
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re: Physical I/O and databases other than oracle
Cary - Thanks so much for providing the historical perspective on this
issue. Perhaps you could confirm
of list ORACLE-L
my email states that in oracle this isnt true. HOWEVER, what about other
databases?
From: Mladen Gogala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/10/02 Thu PM 12:34:33 EDT
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Physical I/O and databases other than oracle
my email states that in oracle this isnt true. HOWEVER, what about other databases?
From: Mladen Gogala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/10/02 Thu PM 12:34:33 EDT
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Physical I/O and databases other than oracle
On Thu, 2003
01:09:36 EDT
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Physical I/O and databases other than oracle
This is not an issue of answering the question, but pointing out that the question
is not correct.
Why do databases exist (aside to make Larry money
