This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message.
If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then
open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.
<>
stty erase ^H
The ^H is your backspace key.
Ron Rogers wrote:
> List,
> I have created a test server using Linux 7.1 and Oracle 8.1.7.3 and it works great.
>The major problem I am having is "I am NOT a typist" and make errors at the SQL
>prompt. What do I set or define in the glogin to allow
You'll have to define it in your profile using
prompt> stty erase
(without the < and >) it is not something that can be set in glogin.sql.
HTH
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any o
Try the command
stty erase
to set 'erase' to the appropriate key sequence for your term type before
starting sqlplus session (or use SQL>!stty erase from within
SQL).
HTH,
- Kirti Deshpande
Verizon Information Services
http://www.superpages.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron
ubject: Re: backspace in Oracle.
>
>
>
> Ron,
>
> I see that you have received a number of emails suggesting that
> you use 'stty erase '.
>
> Unfortunately, that is not quite correct.
>
> I have experienced the same problem on both of my Linux box
Ron,
I see that you have received a number of emails suggesting that
you use 'stty erase '.
Unfortunately, that is not quite correct.
I have experienced the same problem on both of my Linux boxes,
and have found that even though the backspace is set correctly
at the unix command line, it does
On Friday 25 May 2001 13:05, Deshpande, Kirti wrote:
> Jared,
> Is that something specific to Linux?
> The other way (without the -V) works fine on HP-UX and AIX.
> - Kirti
Apparently so. I've two different brands/versions of linux, and I
have to do this in both.
Jared
--
Please see the of
Ditto. I support Jared's backspace claims 100%, and I don't think he should
be removed from the list.
We're working on Linux (Red Hat and SUSE) and Solaris here, and we have this
problem only on Linux.
I've heard there are other operating systems out there besides Linux and
Solaris. Is this true
On Friday 25 May 2001 18:26, Weaver, Walt wrote:
> Ditto. I support Jared's backspace claims 100%, and I don't think he should
> be removed from the list.
I sure appreciate that Walt!
> I've heard there are other operating systems out there besides Linux and
> Solaris. Is this true?
A nasty rum
Jared,
I have an NT 4 server up for 242 days.
Someone where I work suggested it should be sent to Microsoft for an
examination (must be something wrong with it).
Regards,
Bruce
-Original Message-
Sent: Saturday, 26 May 2001 12:16
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
On Friday 25
Apparently this quirky behaviour comes from running one and one only
application on a system. I have heard rumours of this occurring on other
sites when the use a server for a single task. So any rumours you have heard
about its capability as a multitasking OS and being able to pass the 30 day
tes
Isolated case like this have been reported, but seem to be
more of an exception to the norm. I've worked on some
NT boxes in the past, and they were nothing but trouble.
Jared
On Sunday 27 May 2001 17:10, Reardon, Bruce (CALBBAY) wrote:
> Jared,
>
> I have an NT 4 server up for 242 days.
>
Yeah, funny isn't it?
I had my Sparc Station 5 up for just a few days short of a year once.
During that time I added/delete/built many different pieces of open
source software and ran 2 oracle databases.
It crashed due to a Solaris bug that hits sometime after 248 days of
uptime. Who knows,
Jared,
After searching on Oracle's website it does not mention the 248 bug as
existing on NT.
I searched for information on it because I will be there in around a week
:-).
(See my other thread for a slowdown that occurred on the weekend
- possibly related to Oracle insta
If you are in any way responsible for that uptime, you better put
it on your resume.
Jared
On Sunday 27 May 2001 21:30, Reardon, Bruce (CALBBAY) wrote:
> Jared,
>
> After searching on Oracle's website it does not mention the 248 bug as
> existing on NT.
>
> I searched for information on it bec
Bruce,
It's a generic bug (bug 1084273, note 118228.1) that
appears to affect only Unix operating systems, most
notably Solaris. I suspect that the NT architecture
is different enough that it's not affected by this
bug.
Hopefully you'll have this figured out before another
100 days goes by, but
I have built Novell boxes that have 2100+ days of uptime :)
Now that is stability that I have yet to see even unix have.
Granted it is only Novell 3.12.
"Walking on water and developing software from a specification are easy if
both are frozen."
Christopher R. Spence
Oracle DBA
Fuelspot
--
There isn't any known bug under NT. But there are many memory leaks and
poor drivers, that tend to lead to early rebooting. In my experience.
I think the worst problem with NT is not the os but the drivers, even though
Even though I hate NT, for the money, it works well. But if you try to get
Uptime yes... BUT was there anything running on them as complex as a database?
Just joking. I have used Novell in the past ver 2.something and it served the purpose
very well. At my current work location we use 4.12 and it is okay at best. Upgrading
to 5.1 this year before we install a financia
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 05:01:22AM -0800, Christopher Spence wrote:
> I have built Novell boxes that have 2100+ days of uptime :)
>
> Now that is stability that I have yet to see even unix have.
> Granted it is only Novell 3.12.
Novell uptime:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/5/18265.html
=
Ya, but I can keep a NT box for a long time to, if I don't touch it.
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 6:01 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I have built Novell boxes that have 2100+ days of uptime :)
Now that is stability that I have yet to see even unix hav
|| Subject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
||
||
|| I have built Novell boxes that have 2100+ days of uptime :)
||
|| Now that is stability that I have yet to see even unix have.
|| Granted it is only Novell 3.12.
||
||
|| "Walking on water and developing software from a
|| specification are ea
Hey, NT could be up for 2100+ days, I mean, by the time you get there it
won't even be able to play solitaire, but it will be up.
-Original Message-
Spence
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:01 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I have built Novell boxes that have 2100+ days of up
ating...do tell.
|| -Original Message-
|| From: Christopher Spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|| Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:01 AM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
||
||
|| I have built Novell boxes that have 2100+ days of uptime :)
||
|| Now th
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
||
||
|| Ya, but I can keep a NT box for a long time to, if I don't touch it.
||
||
|| -Original Message-
|| Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 6:01 AM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
||
||
|| I
uh.unusual.
>
> I am sure the details are fascinating...do tell.
>
> || -Original Message-
> || From: Christopher Spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> || Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:01 AM
> || To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> || Subject: RE: b
t ORACLE-L
|| Subject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
||
||
|| Ya, but I can keep a NT box for a long time to, if I don't touch it.
||
||
|| -Original Message-
|| Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 6:01 AM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
||
||
|| I have built Novell boxes that have 2100+ da
?
Yea, me neither, but it's a good story, just
like the Novell one.
:)
|| -Original Message-
|| From: Kimberly Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|| Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:36 PM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
||
||
|| Ya, but
y, May 30, 2001 4:03 PM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
||
||
|| Netware 3.12 (or 3.2, which is basically 3.12 with Y2K patches) is
|| amazingly robust/stable. We still have one running a ("unsupported")
|| legacy Oracle 7.3 app with 66mh
It kept trying to win.
It couldn't
|| -Original Message-
|| From: Kevin Kostyszyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|| Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:31 PM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
||
||
|| Oh come on Ross, it wasn'
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
||
||
|| I personally vouch for the machine running Novell for 6
|| years, I built it.
|| It was taken down about 3 months ago. It happened to be a
|| server use to
|| store drivers and os builds to zap down to machines as
> || From: Eric D. Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> || Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:03 PM
> || To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> || Subject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
...
> || Only reason for "downtime" is running VREPAIR (rough equivalent of
> || "
om: Christopher Spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|| Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:47 PM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
||
||
|| I personally vouch for the machine running Novell for 6
|| years, I built it.
|| It was taken down about 3 months ago.
ubject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
root@fatcity.
One thing for sure... it was not in CA !!
Or was it ?
- Kirti
> -Original Message-
> From: Mohan, Ross [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:11 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
>
>
cipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: RE: backspace in Oracle.
||
||
|| that would be if the stupid (HELP) data janitor remembers to do
|| VREPAIR once every other month or so. sometime the stupid data
|| janitor forgets and only does it once a year (with no other
|| downtime).
||
|| in other wor
36 matches
Mail list logo
