Re: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2003-09-15 Thread Anjo Kolk
If it would be a preprocessor define, you wouldn't see it. - Original Message - To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 3:39 PM > Connor rules. > > Tim Gorman wrote: > > >I've performed "nm -o oracle" and "strings -a oracle" on t

Re: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2003-09-13 Thread Mogens Nørgaard
Connor rules. Tim Gorman wrote: I've performed "nm -o oracle" and "strings -a oracle" on the Oracle executable, searching for the phrase "sstiomax" to no avail. To me, that implies that SSTIOMAX is not a variable in the "C" program that is Oracle. Instead, by C programmer conventions, any name e

Re: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2003-09-13 Thread Tim Gorman
Another member of this list was once (possibly still is?) responsible for an application with a database whose DB_BLOCK_SIZE was set to 4608. Mind you, it was most certainly not their choice, but instead was mandated by the vendor. The reasoning for the setting? A "very important" table in this

Re: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2003-09-13 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
Great. Can keep lots of blocks in the buffer pool. Hit ratio is at 110% Try it out some time. At 07:49 AM 9/13/2003 -0800, you wrote: Wolfgang, please let us know how those 8-byte database blocks work for you, OK? Wolfgang Breitling Centrex Consulting Corporation http://www.centrexcc.com -- Please

Re: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2003-09-13 Thread Tim Gorman
I've performed "nm -o oracle" and "strings -a oracle" on the Oracle executable, searching for the phrase "sstiomax" to no avail. To me, that implies that SSTIOMAX is not a variable in the "C" program that is Oracle. Instead, by C programmer conventions, any name expressed in all upper-case would m

Re: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2003-09-13 Thread Ravi Kulkarni
How can we find the value of SSTIOMAX ?(What is it for 9i ?) Thanks, Ravi. --- Tim Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a MetaLink article #131530.1 on the > constant SSTIOMAX which may > provide some interesting reading on this topic > surround "max I/O size" and > the setting of DBFMRC.

Re: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2003-09-13 Thread Tim Gorman
There is a MetaLink article #131530.1 on the constant SSTIOMAX which may provide some interesting reading on this topic surround "max I/O size" and the setting of DBFMRC. The article is over 2 years old -- not sure if it pertains to 9i or above... Wolfgang, please let us know how those 8-byte dat

Re: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2003-09-11 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
db_block_size=8, db_file_multiblock_read_count = 32 That is a Peoplesoft ERP system, a hybrid of oltp and dss with heavy reporting activity at month end. The dfmrc value was established through trial and 10053 trace analysis. Some report sql still require use_hash hints in order to avoid silly

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count + db file scattered read +

2003-03-13 Thread Cary Millsap
I would expect the pread64() calls to map to "db file sequential read" and the readv() calls to map to "db file scattered read". Jeff's "Why are Oracle's Read Events 'Named Backwards'?" explains (www.hotsos.com/catalog). Cary Millsap Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd. http://www.hotsos.com Upcoming events

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count + db file scattered read +

2003-03-13 Thread Erroba, Ildefonso N
Thanks Wolfgang, Cary for taking the time to answer my first question. After taking a second look on the hotsos doc, it did in fact address my problem, specifically the third bullet point. I simply missed to apply the pattern, shown in the example for the third point, to my situation. As for prea

Re: db_file_multiblock_read_count + db file scattered read + truss

2003-03-13 Thread Jonathan Lewis
Purely a guess, but looking at the figures do you think that Oracle is using readv for values up to 128K, and pread for values larger than 128K ? Regards Jonathan Lewis http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk Now available One-day tutorials: Cost Based Optimisation Trouble-shooting and Tuning Inde

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count + db file scattered read + truss

2003-03-13 Thread Cary Millsap
Jun, Wolfgang is correct, and it is covered in Jeff's document. It's the third point (with example) listed at the bottom of page 1. Cary Millsap Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd. http://www.hotsos.com Upcoming events: - Hotsos Clinic 101, Mar 25-27 Oxford - Hotsos Clinic 101, Apr 8-10 Chicago -Or

Re: db_file_multiblock_read_count + db file scattered read +

2003-03-12 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
My explanation is that blocks 1473, 2566, 2580, 2590, 2617, 2628, 2648, 2681, 2695, 2702, 2714, 2719, 2748, 2760, 2773, 2794, 2798, 2811, and 2819 were already in the buffer pool and the FTS reads "around" them. At 08:08 PM 3/12/2003 -0800, you wrote: I have been wondering how to set the optimal

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2001-06-26 Thread Ravinder_Bahadur
AIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: cc: root@fatcity. Subject: RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count/max i/o

2001-06-25 Thread Koivu, Lisa
Title: RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count/max i/o thanks Connor.  Excellent info. Lisa Koivu Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA -Original Message- From:   Connor McDonald [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:   Monday, June 25, 2001 2:18 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count/max i/o

2001-06-25 Thread Christopher Spence
Title: RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count/max i/o Oracle will silently set it to the max setting for the platform.  Meaning the v$parameter will just show what you set it at reguardless of what the max is.  The only way is using truss type utility and monitor the system calls.     "Wa

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count/max i/o

2001-06-25 Thread Connor McDonald
rom: Smith, Ron L. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:12 AM > > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > > Subject:RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count > > > > How do you tell for sure what the max i/o size is > set to? > &

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2001-06-25 Thread Greg Solomon
Title: RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count Hi   A year or two back, the suggestion (on solaris at least) was to avoid using vmstat with the first parm set to a value lower than 10, because the act of measuring perf becomes a drain if you do it every 5 seconds (or less).   I tend to use vmstat

OT : UNIX man and Boredom ... RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2001-06-25 Thread Deshpande, Kirti
://www.superpages.com > -Original Message- > From: Koivu, Lisa [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:23 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count > > Thanks Guy. I don't even have a unix system he

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2001-06-25 Thread Koivu, Lisa
Title: RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count Thanks Guy.  I don't even have a unix system here to do a man page.  Talk about BOREDOM. Lis -Original Message- From:   Guy Hammond [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:   Monday, June 25, 2001 11:28 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORA

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2001-06-25 Thread Mohan, Ross
Title: RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count geez.   Load a trial copy of MKS on NT and get back into da swing of tings, gal!   :) -Original Message-From: Koivu, Lisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 12:23 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count/max i/o

2001-06-25 Thread Koivu, Lisa
Title: RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count/max i/o Um   that was something I relied upon my trusty SA to tell me.  I can't answer that.  Sorry.  Anyone know?  I do know how to determine this is different between platforms.  Lisa -Original Message- From:   Smith, Ron L.

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2001-06-25 Thread Guy Hammond
Title: RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count Hi Lisa,   IIRC, the first line of vmstat gives you cumulative values since system boot. And "2 10" means "every 2 seconds, 10 times" (on Solaris, at any rate).   Cheers,   g   -Original Message-From: Koivu, Li

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2001-06-25 Thread Smith, Ron L.
How do you tell for sure what the max i/o size is set to? -Original Message- Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:23 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Hi Liam, 1. Setting db_file_multiblock_count to a number that when multiplied by your block size is greater than your max i/o siz

RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count

2001-06-25 Thread Koivu, Lisa
Title: RE: db_file_multiblock_read_count Hi Liam, 1.  Setting db_file_multiblock_count to a number that when multiplied by your block size is greater than your max i/o size on your host will encourage full table scans.  I also read somewhere else about the effects of doing this, I know