RE: server sizing [NT: need XEON?]

2001-04-18 Thread Streeter, Lerone A LBX
yes, I made a mistake then... I'll see what I can do to collect metrics on logical/physical I/Os. my information is based on NT/MSSQL, we are moving to oracle so some things you mentioned were never a concern; ultimately I want to have the infrastructure as sound, functional, and scalable as

NT/Oracle defrag: just say no / RE: server sizing [NT: need XEON?]

2001-04-18 Thread Eric D. Pierce
Lerone, (It appears you wanted to also reply to the list, but didn't get the list address into your response, so I'm including your entire message below in this reply to the list. ) Glad you found the info useful. I hope you are going to be able to get a box that can be upgraded from 2

RE: server sizing [NT: need XEON?]

2001-04-17 Thread Reardon, Bruce (CALBBAY)
Lerone, Based on an earlier mail, the following resources may be helpful: I have been tasked with finding an NT server solution to handle 1600 concurrent users. (Please no laughing). Anybody got a clue/recommendations if there's any NT solution that might handle this? (please non of the

RE: server sizing [NT: need XEON?]

2001-04-17 Thread Eric D. Pierce
Lerone, I stumbled across a skimpy, but perhaps interesting, Capacity Planning chapter in: _Oracle Forms Server Release 6i: Deploying Forms Applications to the Web with Oracle Forms Server for Windows and Unix_ http://docs.oracle.com/a84664/SHIPHOME/DOC/product_0/index.htm -