RE: USER_TABLESPACES has more rows than DBA_TABLESPACES

2003-01-15 Thread Fink, Dan
to ORACLE-L To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: USER_TABLESPACES has more rows than DBA_TABLESPACES Keith, yes, it's regular behaviour that the TS$ entry remains but the discrepancy between those 2 views is a bug which

Re: USER_TABLESPACES has more rows than DBA_TABLESPACES

2003-01-14 Thread Keith Moore
I'm still confused. They are not in DBA_TABLESPACES, only USER_TABLESPACES.Keith- Original Message - From: "Stephane Faroult" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 1:34 PMSubject: Re: USER_

RE: USER_TABLESPACES has more rows than DBA_TABLESPACES

2003-01-14 Thread Hately, Mike (NESL-IT)
Keith, yes, it's regular behaviour that the TS$ entry remains but the discrepancy between those 2 views is a bug which is fixed in 8.0.6. Basically, DBA_TABLESPACES excludes 'INVALID' tablespaces but USER_TABLESPACES doesn't. There are duplicates for the bug. The numbers are 284887, 553723 and

Re: USER_TABLESPACES has more rows than DBA_TABLESPACES

2003-01-14 Thread Stephane Faroult
Faroult [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 1:34 PM Subject: Re: USER_TABLESPACES has more rows than DBA_TABLESPACES Keith Moore wrote: Has anyone else seen this or can you explain it? I have 7 tablespaces

RE: USER_TABLESPACES has more rows than DBA_TABLESPACES

2003-01-14 Thread Jared . Still
/14/2003 08:44 AM Please respond to ORACLE-L To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: USER_TABLESPACES has more rows than DBA_TABLESPACES Keith, yes, it's regular behaviour that the TS$ entry remains but the discrepancy

Re: USER_TABLESPACES has more rows than DBA_TABLESPACES

2003-01-13 Thread Stephane Faroult
Keith Moore wrote: Has anyone else seen this or can you explain it? I have 7 tablespaces in USER_TABLESPACES that don't exist in DBA_TABLESPACES. These have been dropped, but somehow did not disappear from USER_TABLESPACES. They have a status of INVALID. The database is version 8.0.5