PROTECTED]
> 05/09/2002 03:47 PM
> Please respond to ORACLE-L
>
>
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> Subject:Server upgrade NT4 -> W2K Oracle implications
>
>
> We have an 8.1.7 SE da
ate the C: partition.
"O'Neill,
Sean"To: Multiple recipients of
list ORACLE-L
@organon.ie> cc:
Sent by: root Subject:
nts of list ORACLE-L
@organon.ie> cc:
Sent by: root Subject: Server upgrade NT4 -> W2K Oracle
Sean,
We did a straight upgrade of an NT box to Win2K (some time ago) that held an
Oracle 8.1.6 database.. The database was fine after the upgrade.. What is
the choice for recreating rather than upgrading?
Mark
-Original Message-
Adar
Sent: 10 May 2002 12:29
To: Multiple recipients of l
1) Oracle uses the registry also to register some staff in other places
except the oracle entry.
2) Oracle also use c:\program files\oracle for some stuff (install log
etc.).
Why do not upgrade the machine without recreating C partition.
(I know that upgrade is more work then ghosting a new C dri
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Server upgrade NT4 -> W2K Oracle implications
We have an 8.1.7 SE database on a server which is currently NT4 SP6. The
System Admin group wish to upgrade the server to W2K and propose
We have an 8.1.7 SE database on a server which is currently NT4 SP6. The
System Admin group wish to upgrade the server to W2K and propose doing so by
recreating the C: partitition. Our Oracle software resides on E: (same
physical disk) and database files on other disks/partitions. Are there any
