Re: arc destination odd behavior

2002-12-11 Thread Yechiel Adar
Title: arc destination odd behavior Hi Lisa   We do things a little different her and have no problems. Before backup we run a script that set the archive bit on for all the existing archive logs: attrib *.* +a (they are written with the archive bit off). after BackupExec finished the backup

RE: arc destination odd behavior

2002-12-10 Thread Jesse, Rich
Yeah, I'm a closet/pseudo Aint's fan. If the Pack loses for the Big One, they're my second choice. Now if they just hadn't given up Ricky, they'd be set. But I digress: As I re-read my original message, it doesn't make sense (I'm 0 for 2 today). What I should have asked is "Do you have multip

RE: arc destination odd behavior

2002-12-10 Thread Koivu, Lisa
Title: RE: arc destination odd behavior Hi Rich - Nope.  It's 1. Can you believe I even forgot to watch the game on Sunday.  I can always cheer for the Bucs, lots of ex-Vikes :)  "Death before losing a game" Have a great night, all. Lisa -Original Message

RE: arc destination odd behavior

2002-12-10 Thread Jesse, Rich
Hey Lisa, Is the value of log_archive_min_succeed_dest > 1? Rich p.s. I guess they really are Bloody Vikings. Hey, there's always next year... :) Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA -Or

arc destination odd behavior

2002-12-10 Thread Koivu, Lisa
Title: arc destination odd behavior Hi all - 8.1.7.2, Windows 2000 sp 2 I'm working on my backupexec implementation.  For some odd reason the backup job that copies the arclogs to tape and deletes them off the disk (what BE calls an 'archive' job) wants to delete th