Im trying to get the word out regarding the new AOS membership special and I
can use your help. From now through March 31st, new members can join for
$49.95/yr or $99.95 for two years. Current members may extend their membership
at the $99.95/2 year rate. While the $5 rebate to the sponsoring s
Dear Friends,
I, for one, am satisfied with my long-standing membership in the AOS, and I
just signed up for another two years.
I'm sorry that I'm becoming a minority, but I'm convinced the magazine is
every bit as good as it was 28 years ago when I first joined. I know,
because I still have
Refreshing to realize that even though in the minority there are others who
agree. Yes the censorship is amazing. Their monitor must have been trained in
the Bush White House. Absolutely nothing of a controversial or thought
provoking nature gets by. It's all just ooh and aahs about your ne
I have to disagree with your statement, Andy, that "No-one with any orchid
savvy wastes time with the AOS Forum ".
I feel that I have some degree of "orchid savvy", and I spend a fair amount of
time there, trying to bring some logical, scientific understanding of "what's
really going on" to the
On 9 Jan 2007 at 8:32, Li'l Frog wrote:
>
> And 75% of the rest are pictures by semi-commercial growers, and ooohs
> and aaahs over the pictures. I can´t remember when an idea was
> expressed last. The forum hasn´t had an opinion about the AOS
> expressed since the new format. The web censor ta
On 9 Jan 2007 at 9:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lee touts the 20,000 posts and ignores the fact that 10% of the posts are by
> one person who doesn't have a clue but feels it's her mission to coddle every
> new beginner with a message of love and understanding.
Hey thanks, Merv. You've mad
HALLELUJAH! Andy, L'il Frog and merv are on track. We aren't the only ones
who decided that the AOS mag-rag "Orchids" is worthless to experienced
growers!
I began AOS membership in 1979. I ended it in 1991. I get FAR better
information from my local orchid society newsletter at $20 per
Yes Merv and Li'l Frog,
You are so right! No-one with any orchid savvy wastes time with the AOS Forum
any more. When I spoke at an area orchid society recently and predicted many
more closures of established orchid nurseries, I was taken to task by several
of the members. I said it will contin
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 8:21 AM
To: orchids@orchidguide.com
Subject: [OGD] AOS membership decline
This shouldn't be a surprise to those of us old enough to remember just how
valuable a resource this was up until about 1995. The power decided to
ignore their base and
This shouldn't be a surprise to those of us old enough to remember just how
valuable a resource this was up until about 1995. The power decided to ignore
their base and target the beginner with one phalaenopsis. "Orchids" became
more and more just a lovely photo-shopped publication and droppe
Sorry to bring a touch of reality to the AOS report but the current membership
is below 19,000 and continuing to fall. Some people believe that the
ill-advised increase in membership dues under the previous slate of officers
led by Art Moore is a major factor in this serious and maybe irreversib
In OGD 358, Bill Bergstrom said:
In response to Epstein's remarks..though well intended perhaps..not nearly
complete enough to spark any more conflict in regards to the status of the
AOS...Here is the message from Lee Cooke to me this morning..." Simply put,
werre1,049 members better than where we
According to the forms 990 the AOS membership total receipts from
dues and assessments has remained fairly constant from 1998 to 2001.
This is in spite of regular increases in dues. I paid, for a two
year membership, $65 in 1998, $72 in 2000 and 2002, and $84 in 2004.
Over the same period pled
The decline and subsequent increase in AOS membership is not hockus pockus. If
you talk to people in most societies, probably 80% that belong or have
belonged to the AOS do so solely because of the AOS Bulletin/Orchids magazine.
They see the membership as a freebie that comes with the subscription.
14 matches
Mail list logo