Fixed.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Emanuele Milani
milani.emanuele...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much!
On Friday, October 24, 2014 9:49:11 AM UTC+2, Andrey Lomakin wrote:
HI,
I will look at it https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/
issues/2977 next week .
On Fri,
Indeed! All tests pass! Thank you!
On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 9:52:22 AM UTC+1, Andrey Lomakin wrote:
Fixed.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Emanuele Milani milani.em...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Thank you very much!
On Friday, October 24, 2014 9:49:11 AM UTC+2, Andrey Lomakin
Hi all,
Could this question be clarified indeed?
Is it correct that two Vertex objects which are referring to the same
record cannot be used safely? So, when a change to the record is done using
one of the Vertex object, is this change reflected always when using the
other Vertex
Hi Andrey,
I tried the same code with 2.0-SNAPSHOT (build 363), but unfortunetely the
problem is still there. Could you also replicate it?
I also tried to check if my local cache is enabled, but I only found in the
docs that it should be enabled by default.
I am now adding a small maven project
Hi all,
If anyone is interested, here is a small maven project which replicates the
issue with some variations (AutostartTx, same or different value is written
to the record...):
https://github.com/emmedemme/OrientDBTests.git
To run the tests, from the root directory of the project:
mvn
Hi all!
I am in the process of debugging an application based on OrientDB (2.0M2).
The problem I am facing are some OConcurrentModificationException. The
issue appears with both the memory and the plocal storage engines (I
did not try remote). It looks they are caused by the fact that multiple
Hi,
Do you have local cache enabled ?
It explicitly created to avoid such problems.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Emanuele Milani
milani.emanuele...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I am in the process of debugging an application based on OrientDB (2.0M2).
The problem I am facing are some
Hi
I got reason of your issue, could you try 2.0-SNAPSHOT.
Problem should be fixed there.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Andrey Lomakin lomakin.and...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Do you have local cache enabled ?
It explicitly created to avoid such problems.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:48 PM,
