rion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
>Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 11:54:00 -0800
>
>See my earlier post on this thread. You can use custom finders with
>_extreme_ ease in Orion. I gave an example for Oracle (since Oracle does
>not
>
www.elephantwalker.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of prasanth sb
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 7:20 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
Hi Jeff and other dear friends,
I had this doubt
is present
in the memory at a time?
thanks,
Prasanth.
>From: "Jeff Schnitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
>Date: Thu,
> From: Curt Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > There are several constraints to BMP beans which make them almost
always
> > perform slower than CMP beans. In particular, the inability to bulk
> > load beans from finder methods is a nearly fatal defect.
>
> I'd like to know more of the deta
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Curt Smith
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:21 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Re: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
>
>
>
>> There are several constrain
CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
> There are several constraints to BMP beans which make them almost always
> perform slower than CMP beans. In particular, the inability to bulk
> load beans from finder methods is a nearly fatal defect.
I'd like to know more of th
> There are several constraints to BMP beans which make them almost always
> perform slower than CMP beans. In particular, the inability to bulk
> load beans from finder methods is a nearly fatal defect.
I'd like to know more of the details?
How does the container deal with the following find
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 6:11 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
>
> If performance is the only factor, BMP performs a million times faster
> than CMP. Well, may be not that much faster, but you get the p
do in BMP.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orion
Newsgroup
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
Subject: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
From: "alt.cyber
Subject: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
From: "alt.cybercafes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===
I am in the process of building a database intensive app and wanted to know
whether to use container manage persistance versus bean manage persistence
for this database instensive a
10 matches
Mail list logo
