that is present
in the memory at a time?
thanks,
Prasanth.
From: Jeff Schnitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 16:22:17 -0800
From: Curt Smith [mailto
www.elephantwalker.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of prasanth sb
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 7:20 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
Hi Jeff and other dear friends,
I had this doubt
statement in your custom finder.
Regards,
the elephantwalker
www.elephantwalker.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of prasanth sb
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 7:20 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better
There are several constraints to BMP beans which make them almost always
perform slower than CMP beans. In particular, the inability to bulk
load beans from finder methods is a nearly fatal defect.
I'd like to know more of the details?
How does the container deal with the following finder
9:21 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
There are several constraints to BMP beans which make them almost always
perform slower than CMP beans. In particular, the inability to bulk
load beans from finder methods is a nearly fatal defect.
I'd like
Of Curt Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:21 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
There are several constraints to BMP beans which make them almost always
perform slower than CMP beans. In particular, the inability to bulk
load beans from
From: Curt Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
There are several constraints to BMP beans which make them almost
always
perform slower than CMP beans. In particular, the inability to bulk
load beans from finder methods is a nearly fatal defect.
I'd like to know more of the details?
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 6:11 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
If performance is the only factor, BMP performs a million times faster
than CMP. Well, may be not that much faster, but you get the point.
CMP is for ease of development
If performance is the only factor, BMP performs a million times faster
than CMP. Well, may be not that much faster, but you get the point.
CMP is for ease of development, basically the container does all the
work for you, but it is not as flexible and you cannot fine tune the
query like you can
