Re: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable

2000-12-13 Thread Peter Pontbriand
- Original Message - From: "Jeff Schnitzer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Orion-Interest" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 4:57 PM Subject: RE: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable FYI, as a workaround, you can make bidirectional relationships work by m

Re: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable

2000-12-11 Thread Peter Pontbriand
- Original Message - From: "Tim Drury" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Orion-Interest" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 5:39 PM Subject: RE: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable Since your bean is called "Foo" I'm going to guess that it is a tr

RE: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable

2000-12-11 Thread Juan Lorandi (Chile)
; } and so on for Identity, and all other fields HTH JP -Original Message- From: Peter Pontbriand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Lunes, 11 de Diciembre de 2000 13:38 To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable - Original Message - From: "Tim Drury&qu

Re: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable

2000-12-11 Thread Peter Pontbriand
EJB2.0 DTD _is_ specified in ejb-jar.xml ... ejb-jar.xml is: - ?xml version="1.0"? !DOCTYPE ejb-jar PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise JavaBeans 2.0//EN" "http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd" P.Pontbriand Canlink Interactive Technologies Inc.

RE: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable

2000-12-11 Thread Tim Drury
In EJB 2.0 gets/sets are declared abstract. The container implements them for you. -tim -Original Message- From: Juan Lorandi (Chile) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 1:42 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: RE: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable geez

RE: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable

2000-12-11 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:43 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: RE: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable I don't think we've ever cleared up whether this is needed or not: in ejb-jar.xml: entity cmp-version2.x/cmp-version ... Your bar ejb seems to reference

RE: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable

2000-12-08 Thread Tim Drury
Since your bean is called "Foo" I'm going to guess that it is a trivial "Hello World" bean. Why don't you post the bean code and the ejb-jar.xml (don't attach/zip/etc - just dump it)? -tim -Original Message- From: Peter Pontbriand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December

RE: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable

2000-12-08 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
I've been using EJB2.0 beans (including container managed relationships) with considerable success for several months now. It works (mostly). Don't give up :-) I haven't seen that particular error message, but I have noticed that occasionally Orion screws up the deployment and forgets to

Re: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable

2000-12-08 Thread Serge Knystautas
- Original Message - From: "Peter Pontbriand" [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've just written our first pair of 2.0-spec EJBs and are experiencing some really strange problems deploying them. Orion 1.4.4 auto-generates the DB tables for these beans, but then spits out the following message for

RE: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable

2000-12-08 Thread Juan Lorandi (Chile)
use autoupdate or find it in http://www.orionserver.com/orion/orion.jar use at own risk! (actually, 1.4.4 is VERY stable) -Original Message- From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Viernes, 08 de Diciembre de 2000 20:48 To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: EJB2.0 Generated

RE: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable

2000-12-08 Thread Scott Stirling
Take the version you have and do: cd $ORION_HOME java -jar autoupdate.jar This will pull down the latest released build from Orion. Pretty sweet feature. Scott Stirling West Newton, MA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Serge Knystautas

Re: EJB2.0 Generated class uncompilable

2000-12-08 Thread Jim Archer
You might want to go to: http://www.orionsupport.com And grab the simple EJB 2.0 sample... Jim --On Friday, December 08, 2000 4:02 PM -0500 Peter Pontbriand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All. We've just written our first pair of 2.0-spec EJBs and are experiencing some really strange