; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 May 2000 12:20
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Re: Makefiles
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Ernst,
>
> > However, I find ant less powerful than make, beca
Well, then why make everyone suffer... make your ant code public, and become
a hero :)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 10:20 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Re: Makefiles
>
>
>
Hi Ernst,
> However, I find ant less powerful than make, because with the
> Makefile I am building I just have to change the name of the application
> and the names of the beans in order to get a new makefile for a different
> EJB application.
I would contend that Ant can be as powerful as
Hi James,
Thank you very much for the pointer to Ant. I am evaluating it as we
speak. However, I find ant less powerful than make, because with the
Makefile I am building I just have to change the name of the application
and the names of the beans in order to get a new makefile for a different
EJ
Take a look at Jakarta Ant
http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/index.html
Written in Java, uses an XML makefile format... very nice! Our build is
entirely automated using Ant and our customised Tasks.
Regards,
James Dodd
ZDNet
Ernst de Haan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/16/2000 01:25:40 P
