Netscape has been the bane of developers for years. I doubt that it will get
better with version 6. How about Opera?
Netscape has been the bane of developers for years. I doubt that it will get
better with version 6. How about Opera?
Netscape has been the bane of developers for years. I doubt that it will get
better with version 6. How about Opera?
ve to endure all of N's flaws.
regards
Johan Fredriksson
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Hodges" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: R: Why is Netscape slower with Orion?
*sigh*
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Eric Hodges wrote:
[snipped suggestion to flatten tables for broader browser support]
> Are you sure it's not:
>
> Don't use Netscape.
Sure. And only use English. And require Flash. And ...
A very good way to NOT reach the broadest audience possible.
Great strategy.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: R: Why is Netscape slower with Orion?
> We found that if the table depth was more than 5 or so
:Re: R: Why is Netscape slower with Orion?
This is because netscape's ui is based on parsing XML every
time is has to
render. What a pain in the butt. Who thought of that?
> From: Marco Isella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Yup we ran up against this last week, and we changed the layout from 4
nested to 3 and it's just fine that way. It seems the folks at netscape
didn't think anyone would nest 4 tables or something. IE and N6 are much
faster at it indeed. That's not the issue that was causing the slowness
tho
This is because netscape's ui is based on parsing XML every time is has to
render. What a pain in the butt. Who thought of that?
> From: Marco Isella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:58:19 +0100
> To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
