RE: mapping of existing m2m tables

2001-01-16 Thread Tim Squires
there are no choices? Thanks, Tim. -Original Message- From: Frank Eggink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2001 10:31 To: Orion-Interest Subject: RE: mapping of existing m2m tables Maybe a bit late, but I guess using custom finder queries in the home interface could be an option as wel

RE: mapping of existing m2m tables

2001-01-16 Thread Frank Eggink
to copy and > paste so much between beans! > > Two problems: one the JSP pages are getting a bit big, two the JSP > programmers take a little longer to understand the theory. > > Thanks again and please post again if you have any more ideas, > Tim. > > -Original Mes

RE: mapping of existing m2m tables

2001-01-15 Thread Tim Squires
AIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 January 2001 14:46 To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: mapping of existing m2m tables Hi Tim, Sounds like you've implemented this with Entity EJBs. I could be wrong, but most J2EE platform products (WebLogic, Orion, etc) implement Entity EJb containers so that there is

Re: mapping of existing m2m tables

2001-01-12 Thread Jay Armstrong
Hi Tim, Sounds like you've implemented this with Entity EJBs. I could be wrong, but most J2EE platform products (WebLogic, Orion, etc) implement Entity EJb containers so that there is an instance of a given Entity bean for every existing row in your table -- for large databases, this means that