Re: [os-libsynthesis] superdatastore in SyncML client

2010-02-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Do, 2010-02-11 at 19:50 +, Patrick Ohly wrote: [no target for superdatastore] The only solution I see is to make the subdatastore URI's more complex: instead of foo, let's use foo:uri where foo is the name of the superdatastore and uri its remote URI. I'm going with that and have syncs

Re: [os-libsynthesis] superdatastore in SyncML client

2010-02-12 Thread Lukas Zeller
Hi Patrick, I can just say, if you come to the point where a superdatastore seems to need any admin data (profiles, maps, anchors, whatever) you're off track :-) So, regarding engPrepareClientSyncAlert(): The problem is that this, as a client-only routine, has never been made superdatastore

Re: [os-libsynthesis] superdatastore in SyncML client

2010-02-12 Thread Lukas Zeller
Hi Patrick, There can't be a a target nor a TBinfileImplDS for the superdatastore. This still holds true... You almost had me convinced and I already changed quite a bit of code, until I came to the point where I wanted to call dsSetClientSyncParams() for the superdatastore. If that store

Re: [os-libsynthesis] superdatastore in SyncML client

2010-02-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Fr, 2010-02-12 at 17:14 +, Lukas Zeller wrote: The only solution I see is to make the subdatastore URI's more complex: instead of foo, let's use foo:uri where foo is the name of the superdatastore and uri its remote URI. Makes sense. Just a cosmetic thought: why not foouri, so the