On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Robert Osfield
wrote:
> We have Mailman hosted by dreamhost that does osg-users and
> osg-submissions.
> The OpenSceneGraph Users mailing list is a mirror of the osg-users
> mailing list.
This is where I get confused. I know what osg-users is, but then
what/wh
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Robert Osfield
mailto:robert.osfi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 20 November 2017 at 19:52, Chris Hanson mailto:xe...@alphapixel.com>> wrote:
> For purposes of discussion, do you believe the Google forum
would improve on
> this in any way?
One
Hi Chris,
On 20 November 2017 at 21:05, Chris Hanson wrote:
>> One issue we'd need to resolve is who is the current owner of the
>> "OpenSceneGraph Users". I can't see a why of finding out who that is
>> from the web interface right now.
>
> I'm not sure I understand that issue.
>
> My under
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Robert Osfield
wrote:
> On 20 November 2017 at 19:52, Chris Hanson wrote:
> > For purposes of discussion, do you believe the Google forum would
> improve on
> > this in any way?
> One issue we'd need to resolve is who is the current owner of the
> "OpenSceneGraph
On 20 November 2017 at 19:52, Chris Hanson wrote:
> For purposes of discussion, do you believe the Google forum would improve on
> this in any way?
It would solve the dual ML/forum issue and not require a new server to
be set up.
One issue we'd need to resolve is who is the current owner of the
> Place: the resource will be employed
Ugh.
On 20 November 2017 at 22:57, Alessandro Terenzi wrote:
> Hello dear OSG-community, I'm posting a job call on behalf of my company,
> please read the details below and get in touch if you are interested.
>
> Job description
>
> ABOUT INGLOBE TECHNOLOG
Ok. Thanks for the background. I was unfamiliar with the situation.
For purposes of discussion, do you believe the Google forum would improve
on this in any way?
(Written by a guy who still runs a forum descended from EGROUPS for cryin'
out loud...)
_
Hi Chris,
On 20 November 2017 at 19:04, Chris Hanson wrote:
> Alternately, we could probably pick up and move the current forum software
> to different hosting. I don't use the actual forum so I'm not aware of what
> issues it might be having that might need fixing, or if it should just be
> dump
I'm ok with the Google thing.
Alternately, we could probably pick up and move the current forum software
to different hosting. I don't use the actual forum so I'm not aware of what
issues it might be having that might need fixing, or if it should just be
dumped entirely.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5
Hello dear OSG-community, I'm posting a job call on behalf of my company,
please read the details below and get in touch if you are interested.
Job description
ABOUT INGLOBE TECHNOLOGIES
Inglobe Technologies is a leading company that develops Software and Solutions
that enable the creation of
Hi All,
Our forum has been limping along for quite a few years now, the server
it's presently on is one we need to migrate away from so we need to
decide what to do about what we do for the forum/ML going forward.
We have the dreamhost server that presently hosts the website and the
osg-users and
Hi Robert,
My idea is that this could evolve into a large set of tutorials. Every header
in the TOC would be a separate tutorial, responsible for teaching a osg concept.
Each tutorial will have the one markup file containing the "lesson" and then
the corresponding source code as separate files.
Hi Björn,
Thanks for your efforts on the tutorials. I had a quick look at what
you have done so far, but am not yet clear how you are thinking it
might evolve. I noticed both .md and .html files, are both something
that will be maintained?
On 19 November 2017 at 21:18, Björn Blissing wrote:
>
As I said in my previous email. There is only one example tutorial right now.
The first one in the basic category: "basic geometry"
The rest is as you say only a TOC.
I haven't checked readthedocs yet. It may be an option. But I like markdeep for
its feature set.
Regards
Björn
Den 20 nov. 2
Hi.
I can't see any tutorial. It's just a Table Of Contents. I guess at
least one tutorial is necessary to evaluate navigation.
As a side note, https://readthedocs.org/ hosts lots of docs with a
nice navigation, so this might be an option.
On 20 November 2017 at 00:18, Björn Blissing wrote:
> Hi
15 matches
Mail list logo
