Re: [osg-users] Creating a annex/attic repository for old and no longer used parts of the OSG

Option 2 is better. 2016-06-20 21:16 GMT+07:00 Jan Ciger : > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Alberto Luaces wrote: > >> Robert Osfield writes: >> >> > Thoughts? >> >> In my opinion, a new repo implies extra maintenance duties (even they >> are likely

Re: [osg-users] Creating a annex/attic repository for old and no longer used parts of the OSG

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Alberto Luaces wrote: > Robert Osfield writes: > > > Thoughts? > > In my opinion, a new repo implies extra maintenance duties (even they > are likely low), but cannot guarantee that it is synced or working with > the latest OSG version, so it has

Re: [osg-users] Creating a annex/attic repository for old and no longer used parts of the OSG

Robert Osfield writes: > Thoughts? In my opinion, a new repo implies extra maintenance duties (even they are likely low), but cannot guarantee that it is synced or working with the latest OSG version, so it has a little added value. Removing things at the point they were working is a good aid

[osg-users] Creating a annex/attic repository for old and no longer used parts of the OSG

Hi All, I would like to trim down the core OpenSceneGraph so it no longer has dead/unused components. One such example is the DW (Designer Workbench) plugin that I wrote about last week, and got zero replies for anyone with any interest in using it, I could just remove this dead code with the