For me... just because a conference convenor might ask me to do Open Space -
and even though I love Open Space - does not mean I would do it. I have so many
other questions to ask them before I know what process 'tool' is a best fit for
the objectives, desired outcomes, time available, physical
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:00 AM, paul levy wrote:
> Perhaps those who don't think these blended forms work, are bringing a
> purist mindset that creates a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Sometimes
> do it by the book, and sometimes let the in-the-moment book of life suggest
> the pace and for
*Daniel Mezick
*Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2014 10:13 PM
*To:* oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
*Subject:* [OSList] "Parallel" Open Space at XP2014 Rome?
Open Space includes a theme, and proceedings. It also asks that no
other events be going on at the same time.
That’s
I agree with Chris on this.
It saddens me when people become dogmatically purist about, of all things,
open space. Also the distaste for programmed conference is outdated and
childish. Open Space itself has changed the deeper orientation many people
have to scheduled events; often an programmed ev
Definitely a different experience leading a track rather than a whole
event. More work and less fun facilitating, but neither of those are deal
killers for me. Usually.
Another view that I encourage as strongly as I can get away with, in
parallel or serial designs, is one that understands open spa
cetech.org [mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org] On Behalf Of Daniel MezickSent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 10:13 PMTo: oslist@lists.openspacetech.orgSubject: [OSList] "Parallel" Open Space at XP2014 Rome? Open Space includes a theme, and proceedings. It also asks that no other events b
h.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Mezick
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 10:13 PM
To: oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
Subject: [OSList] "Parallel" Open Space at XP2014 Rome?
Open Space includes a theme, and proceedings. It also asks that no other
events be going on at the same time.
That
In a complex world there are never "nevers". Who knows how it will work or not,
whether it is correct or not or whether it is just what is needed.
More important than guessing about how it will go will be learning about how it
went. Perhaps we will hear the story.
Chris
--
CHRIS CORRIGAN
Har
Hear hear...
Spark ;-) 원본 메일 제목: Re: [OSList] "Parallel" Open Space at XP2014 Rome?보낸사람: Chris Corrigan 보낸날짜: 금, 2014-04-25 15:24받는사람: World wide Open Space Technology email list 참조: In a complex world there are never "nevers". Who knows how it will work o
Dear OS friends in Korea,
Everyone is unique and common for humanity at the same time...
Isn't that who we are?
Spark 원본 메일 제목: Re: [OSList] "Parallel" Open Space at XP2014 Rome?보낸사람: a...@alanhalford.com.au보낸날짜: 금, 2014-04-25 11:25받는사람: World wide Open Space T
we ran traditional conference, complete with juried papers and such,
parallel with open space AND parallel with birds of a feather AND parallel
with working sessions where folks were taking turns writing code for a few
hours at a time, on a real (pro bono) project that delivered working
software at
On the surface looks dodgy!
But, who knows the context? Personally i think it fits with the principles and
the Law of two feet, in particular 'whatever happens is the only thing that
could have'
Most importantly the space will be open!!
Ciao Bello
Alan
Alan Halford
Facilitator
Mediator
www.ala
Open Space includes a theme, and proceedings. It also asks that no other
events be going on at the same time.
That's why the XP2014 event in Rome gives me pause. Someone here
mentioned that this event is offering a "parallel Open Space". Wow. Is
that right?
The last time I checked, the Ope
13 matches
Mail list logo
