Re: Givens re egroups

2000-07-01 Thread Murli Nagasundaram
Michelle, you probably have a good point here about the givens, especially for people who joined much after OSLIST was created, back in late 1996. We got the thing off the ground without messing around with details, just to have something for the OST community to use for engaging in dialogue. Th

Re: Givens re egroups

2000-06-30 Thread Michelle Cooper
Diane, Murli, Chris and others; I have not been able to follow all of the conversations on the list as quickly as others these past weeks. Thanks for the follow up to my query. My question was not really in regard to technology or no technology, but about the givens. Murli's response as to how the

Re: Givens re egroups

2000-06-30 Thread Murli Nagasundaram
At 08:44 AM 6/30/00 -0700, you wrote: Thank you Jan and Murli for the clarifications you brought. You're welcome, Diane. You detected well the piece that was missing for me. Maybe this had been said before within the numerous messages that went out but if it did, I missed it and I am sorry for

Re: Givens re egroups

2000-06-30 Thread Chris Corrigan
Diane: I thank you for raising the idea of givens around egroups etc...we should walk our talk after all. For me, I actually found OSLIST by surfing, so I have a soft spot for making it open. However, I'm careful with my stories to not "out" organizations or communities I'm working with where th

Givens re egroups

2000-06-30 Thread Diane Gibeault
Thank you Jan and Murli for the clarifications you brought. My comments were made in response to Michelle's question about creating safe space in the new format. From her message I understood that the egroup contrary to the oslist would automatically be opened to any web surfer, looking for nothin

Re: Givens re egroups

2000-06-28 Thread Jan Nickerson
In a message dated 06/28/2000 1:51:51 PM Eastern Daylight Time, d...@cyberus.ca writes: << Who's there on the egroup (web accessed) will no longer be answerable it seems >> Diane, it sounds as if you're concerned that once on the web, the oslist is more accessible to the public - to strangers.

Re: Givens re egroups

2000-06-28 Thread Murli Nagasundaram
Another clarification: Listserv is no more and no less secure than Egroups. Anyone -- just anyone -- with the necessary subscription instructions can subscribe to either. The subscription instructions are publicly available. Anyone -- just anyone -- who has subscribed, can access the archive

Givens re egroups

2000-06-28 Thread Diane Gibeault
I have been silent on this issue, since I am just catching up in reading past messages. I have no technological wisedom to contribute but Michelle's question (below) touched upon a cord. I feel the OSChatlist is a coummunity. There was something safe about exploring ideas and questions within a c