tserv.boisestate.edu]On Behalf Of Jimbo
Ale
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 10:54 PM
To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
Subject: The whole system in one room
Michael M Pannwitz wrote:
What I like best is to have a space large enough so that all the
breakout spaces can be in one room (t
n Behalf Of Jimbo
Ale
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 10:54 PM
To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
Subject: The whole system in one room
Michael M Pannwitz wrote:
What I like best is to have a space large enough so that all the
breakout spaces can be in one room (the whole system in one room)
Yo, Jimbo
We like separate breakout spaces, because it clearly shows the
difference between working in a large group (community) and smaller
groups. Also, separate small spaces seem to be quieter and promote
better flow of dialogue. And they allow people to stretch and move
around. Sometimes
bo
Ale
Sent: Tuesday, 11 April 2000 12:54
To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
Subject: The whole system in one room
Michael M Pannwitz wrote:
What I like best is to have a space large enough so that all the
breakout spaces can be in one room (the whole system in one room)
with possib
Hi Chris and thanks for your interesting points.
I like the idea of having piles of chairs instead of arranging circles that
might be to large or too small.
About the calculation dividing the number (theatrestyle) by two. I'm having
a OS in october with 200 participants in a "room for 400 theatrest
Michael M Pannwitz wrote:
What I like best is to have a space large enough so that all the
breakout spaces can be in one room (the whole system in one room)
with possibility of more spaces outside that main place.
I'm curious about other people's experience with opening
e large enough so that all the
> breakout spaces can be in one room (the whole system in one room)
> with possibility of more spaces outside that main place.
>
> I'm curious about other people's experience with opening space in a single
> space.
>
> 1. Do
