Dear Ted,
Thanks for your question. The case where two dissimilar events were
co-located,
the sponsor was a conference centre organisation using a series of Open
Space events
in different content areas to find out what future trends there would
be and how to cooperate
with different stakeholde
Thank you, Gerard, this is fantstic!
On 3/13/06, Gerard Muller wrote:
> Dear Ted,
>
> Thanks for your question. The case where two dissimilar events were
> co-located,
> the sponsor was a conference centre organisation using a series of Open
> Space events
> in different content areas to find out
Hello Ted,
I have tried that three times.
The first were two events where the two groups had little to do with
eachother,
two facilitators.
The second was two paralel sessions (though the only two at that point)
in an international
conference. two facilitators, but . one closing
i remember you telling this story when we had lunch a few years ago,
larry. this seems more like what we have in our situation in chicago.
we have many people and many projects/purposes/networknames, but not
really many groups. a bunch of us are in a core circle and we each
know some other netwo
Two years ago a group of us facilitated 5 co-located (and simultaneous)
OS events, each with a different but related theme. The total
participation was about 400 and participants sighed up for the OS they
wanted to attend but their was also movement. Each issues had emerged
at a previous, larger
Gerard,
I'm very curious why you choose seperate circles in the times when the
issues were related, and why you co-located dis-similer events in that
instance. Thanks much for sharing!
peace,
ted
On 3/10/06, Gerard Muller wrote:
> Hello Ted,
>
> I have tried that three times.
>
> The first wer
Hi, all -
Jimmy wrote that a certain conference...:
<... cannot accommodate more than the 1200 already booked. There are
probably several hundred more that were planning on attending. It occurred
to me that one option would be to book a separate location in the vicinity
and make it an Ope
Behalf Of Michael
Herman
Sent: March 9, 2006 8:52 AM
To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
Subject: Re: co-located open space events
one thing ted left out of the opening query here is that one
organization might be feeling skittish about being lumped into
something else. it's new enough that it wa
rsonal website www.ho-image.com
> > OSLIST: To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the
> > archivesVisit: www.listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.e
Hi -
I had written:
Michael, you wrote - and I'm thinking you were responding to what I wrote?:
< i do think that one event can have only one invitation. first
because it's too much work to write more than one. more importantly,
thought, it seems that all ppts should show up for the
March 09, 2006 10:29 AM
To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
Subject: Re: co-located open space events
When I read the subject line I imagined an event happening in two
locations rather than two events happening in one location.
The former might be a solution to a situation I find myself in
now.
view the
> archivesVisit: www.listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu] On Behalf Of Jimmy
> Pryor
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 10:29 AM
> To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
> S
n Behalf Of Harrison
Owen
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:39 AM
To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
Subject: Re: co-located open space events
From: Les Burleson [mailto:lburle...@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:14 AM
To: hho...@verizon.net
Subject: RE: co-located open space events
Ther
From: Diane Brandon [mailto:diane.bran...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:22 AM
To: hho...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [OSLIST] co-located open space events
We did a world cafe short event where we had about 12 topics (community
setting); people talked at topic tables, then shifted
son
> Owen
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:39 AM
> To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
> Subject: Re: co-located open space events
>
> From: Les Burleson [mailto:lburle...@nc.rr.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:14 AM
> To: hho...@verizon.net
> Subject: RE: co-loc
When I read the subject line I imagined an event happening in two
locations rather than two events happening in one location.
The former might be a solution to a situation I find myself in
now. The Friends General Conference annual Gathering has unexpectely
sold out in 5 days, four months bef
From: Les Burleson [mailto:lburle...@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:14 AM
To: hho...@verizon.net
Subject: RE: co-located open space events
There might be something to this idea of two open spaces being held at
the same time. The most exciting developments I see on the horizon are
your options, view the
archives Visit: www.listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
-Original Message-
From: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu] On Behalf Of Ted Ernst
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 1:46 AM
To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
Subject: co-located open space
Hello, all -
Ted wrote:
...and Les wrote:
< The most exciting developments I see on the horizon are
happening as a result of cross-platform communication between
disciplines. For example what happens when we overlay the most recent
advancements in biology with computer science or mechanical sys
Traditional conferences somtimes co-locate because of their
overlapping communities or for various other reasons. Sometimes an OS
event is co-located with a traditional event, maybe calling them
tracks or whatever.
What about two OS events, co-located? I've got a brainstorm cooking
here, with th
20 matches
Mail list logo
