[ossec-list] Re: WIn server 2008

2011-04-06 Thread joshua.gruber
This looks an oversight that is a potential problem on a lot of the rules in msauth_rules.xml. The event log ID's can be 5 digits (they go up to 65535) and so any id in the rule set that's less than 5 digits should have both the ^ and the $, as you indicate. There might not be a 52901 yet but

[ossec-list] Re: ossec-logtest is performing differently from running ossec

2011-04-06 Thread joshua.gruber
Of joshua.gruber Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 6:14 AM To: ossec-list Subject: [ossec-list] ossec-logtest is performing differently from running ossec Okay, per microsoft, when XP and 2008 co-mingle the handshake always starts with an AUDIT_FAILURE(4769) event, Failure Code 0xe.  The old

[ossec-list] Re: New and need help

2011-04-06 Thread joshua.gruber
I concur with Jeremy, you probably want to look to something like Snort as well for IDS needs. As to Audit events... I would suggest looking at the events one at a time to address them. They likely are telling you about real issues that you want to correct rather than simply squelching. For

[ossec-list] Re: Agent server communication issue

2011-04-06 Thread joshua.gruber
Have you tried testing traffic on a test port to make certain traffic is getting there and coming from the direction you expect? For instance: on the good server: tcpdump -n 'port 55512' on the bad agent machine: echo hello? | netcat goodserverip 55512 See if the traffic gets to the good

[ossec-list] ossec-logtest is performing differently from running ossec

2011-04-01 Thread joshua.gruber
Okay, per microsoft, when XP and 2008 co-mingle the handshake always starts with an AUDIT_FAILURE(4769) event, Failure Code 0xe. The old systems just don't speak the new Kerberos language. This is filling up my IDS logs as OSSEC doesn't like the big bold FAILURE there. So I put in some version