Re: [otrs] ActivePerl and Windows

2009-05-11 Thread Afshar Mohebbi
.org] *On Behalf > Of *Michiel Beijen > *Sent:* Monday, May 11, 2009 3:48 PM > *To:* User questions and discussions about OTRS. > *Subject:* Re: [otrs] ActivePerl and Windows > > > > Jeff, > > Yes, OTRS 2.x is 'compatible' with ActivePerl 5.10 as that is 'j

Re: [otrs] ActivePerl and Windows

2009-05-11 Thread Nathan Campbell
, 2009 3:48 PM To: User questions and discussions about OTRS. Subject: Re: [otrs] ActivePerl and Windows Jeff, Yes, OTRS 2.x is 'compatible' with ActivePerl 5.10 as that is 'just' a binary distribution of Perl 5.10. The only reason (as far as I know) that ActivePerl is n

Re: [otrs] ActivePerl and Windows

2009-05-11 Thread Michiel Beijen
Jeff, Yes, OTRS 2.x is 'compatible' with ActivePerl 5.10 as that is 'just' a binary distribution of Perl 5.10. The only reason (as far as I know) that ActivePerl is no longer part of the Windows installer but replaced with StrawberryPerl is because of licensing issues. ActivePerl has a restrictiv

[otrs] ActivePerl and Windows

2009-05-11 Thread Jeff Travers
I've opted to do a manual install of OTRS with ActivePerl on Windows. Are 2.3.4 and 2.4.x compatible with ActivePerl 5.10.0.1004? - OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/ Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs