Re: [otrs] Users / Groups - Permissions - Concept

2007-05-21 Thread Alexander Scholler
Hi Joey, joey schrieb: [...] Internal etc) if they don't really know if its "X,Y or Z" (this may be "Incidident", "Request" or whatever), or if the ticket is clear, sort them directly into the "X, Y or Z" sub-queues. [...] Note that with v2.2, you do not need special queues for Incidents, Re

Re: [otrs] Users / Groups - Permissions - Concept

2007-05-15 Thread joey
Thanks for the fast reply! Hrm.. so i can grant permission for a group to specific sub-queue?! the groupt does not need permissions on the main-queue (that's what i read somewhere else)?? Joey Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet) wrote: > Nathan Campbell wrote: > >> As far as I know, the system do

RE: [otrs] Users / Groups - Permissions - Concept

2007-05-15 Thread Nathan Campbell
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:17 PM To: User questions and discussions about OTRS.org Subject: RE: [otrs] Users / Groups - Permissions - Concept Nathan Campbell wrote: > As far as I know, the system does not allow literal sub-queues, but you > can create all of those queues and using the

RE: [otrs] Users / Groups - Permissions - Concept

2007-05-15 Thread Nils Breunese \(Lemonbit Internet\)
Nathan Campbell wrote: > As far as I know, the system does not allow literal sub-queues, but you > can create all of those queues and using the filters and user group / > queue permissions you can accomplish this easily. According to the docs sub queues *are* implemented: "You can specify the nam

RE: [otrs] Users / Groups - Permissions - Concept

2007-05-15 Thread Nathan Campbell
As far as I know, the system does not allow literal sub-queues, but you can create all of those queues and using the filters and user group / queue permissions you can accomplish this easily. I'm sure lots of sites are doing similar implementations. The permissions can be setup so only assigned qu