I wanted to share a small status update:
Anil and I have been working on this [1] and we expect to post
some preliminary patches before the end of the week.
I can confirm that the BFD + bundle(active_backup) strategy
works well from the hypervisors point of view. With 1 sec BFD
pings we get a ~2
Hi All,
Reading the release note of DPDK section for OVS2.6, I note below:
* Basic connection tracking for the userspace datapath (no ALG,
fragmentation or NAT support yet)
I am wondering for the missing part (no ALG, fragmentation, NAT), can I have
the release plan for such feature
This probably isn’t an optimal solution, as openvswitch runs on a number of
different platforms. I am not sure how to perform a proper selection of
ifconfig vs ip link. But i think I noticed some other openvswitch scripts use
ip link only.
The first change below relates to my previous messa
ok, sorry, this message can be ignored, I see github changes on Mar 17 to
reflect the ‘ip link’ change, but I think that the
'/etc/init.d/openvswitch-switch status’ may still be a problem.
> On 24 May 2017, at 08:42, Raymond Burkholder wrote:
>
> This probably isn’t an optimal solution, as op
Does your '/etc/init.d/openvswitch-switch have the following line:
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/debian/openvswitch-switch.init#L30
That line should prevent any redirects to systemd.
On 24 May 2017 at 08:05, Raymond Burkholder wrote:
> ok, sorry, this message can be ignored, I
Hi,
Let's have a look at the progress of the different patch series with respect to
submission, review and merging.
Target is still to upstream these changes in time for OVS 2.8.
Thank you,
Jan
Link to the Google design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oWMYUH8sjZJzWa72o2q9kU0N6pNE-rwZcL
> On 24 May 2017, at 09:31, Guru Shetty wrote:
>
> Does your '/etc/init.d/openvswitch-switch have the following line:
> https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/debian/openvswitch-switch.init#L30
>
> That line should prevent any redirects to systemd.
>
yes it does have:
_SYSTEMCTL_SKI
On 24 May 2017 at 09:06, Raymond Burkholder wrote:
>
> > On 24 May 2017, at 09:31, Guru Shetty wrote:
> >
> > Does your '/etc/init.d/openvswitch-switch have the following line:
> > https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/
> debian/openvswitch-switch.init#L30
> >
> > That line should prev
On 05/22/2017 04:43 PM, Jan Scheurich wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Thanks a lot for addressing this very important limitation of OVS-DPDK
> multi-core scalability in cloud contexts such as OpenStack. This is highly
> appreciated!
>
> We have not started testing this, so for the time being just some h
>
> Can you do a 'sh -x /etc/init.d/openvswitch-switch status' to see whether it
> looks at _SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT in any of the system libraries.
>
> For e.g, on a ubuntu15.04, when I run the above command, I get a match for
> _SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT variable in /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/4
On 24 May 2017 at 10:10, Raymond Burkholder wrote:
> >
> > Can you do a 'sh -x /etc/init.d/openvswitch-switch status' to see
> whether it looks at _SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT in any of the system libraries.
> >
> > For e.g, on a ubuntu15.04, when I run the above command, I get a match
> for _SYSTEMC
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
wrote:
> I wanted to share a small status update:
>
> Anil and I have been working on this [1] and we expect to post
> some preliminary patches before the end of the week.
>
> I can confirm that the BFD + bundle(active_backup) strategy
> wo
Thank you for the patches.
Acked-By: Anand Kumar
Thanks,
Anand Kumar
On 5/23/17, 10:59 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Alin
Serdean" wrote:
The removal is mandatory to use the VStudio 2013 static code analyzer.
The only function that was used from the include
Acked-by: Anand Kumar
Thanks,
Anand Kumar
On 5/23/17, 10:59 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Alin
Serdean" wrote:
Add two new build targets: 'Win8Analyze' and 'Win8.1Analyze'.
The new build targets have the static code analyzer (built in Visual
Studio feature).
Acked-by: Anand Kumar
Thanks,
Anand Kumar
On 5/23/17, 10:59 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Alin
Serdean" wrote:
This patch adds the new make target 'datapath_windows_analyze' (static
analysis over the windows datapath code) to the appveyor build.
Signed-off
On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 16:02 -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Clang 4.0 has added some new warnings around taking the address of packed
> members of structures which may result in unaligned pointer values. This
> series
> addresses the resulting compilation failures (reported via -Werror).
>
> Joe Str
Current versions of systemd in Debian Stretch use
SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT instead of _SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT.
Provide both variables in the .init files.
Signed-off-by: Raymond Burkholder
Suggested-by: Guru Shetty
---
debian/openvswitch-switch.init | 1 +
debian/ovn-central.init | 1 +
From: Raymond Burkholder
Current versions of systemd in Debian Stretch use
SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT instead of _SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT.
Provide both variables in the .init files.
Signed-off-by: Raymond Burkholder
Suggested-by: Guru Shetty
---
debian/openvswitch-switch.init | 1 +
debian/ovn-
Dear Sir/Madam,
I write to make inquiry if it is possible to make reservation for 4 guests in
your accommodation facility for the period of 7 days stay from 23rd of
September, 2017 till 30th of September, 2017.
We will be needing either 2 double rooms or 4 Single rooms or an apartment for
4 pe
On 24 May 2017 at 12:56, root wrote:
> From: Raymond Burkholder
>
> Current versions of systemd in Debian Stretch use
> SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT instead of _SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT.
> Provide both variables in the .init files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raymond Burkholder
> Suggested-by: Guru Shetty
>
On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 19:56 +, root wrote:
> From: Raymond Burkholder
>
> Current versions of systemd in Debian Stretch use
> SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT instead of _SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT.
> Provide both variables in the .init files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raymond Burkholder
> Suggested-by: Guru
> On 24 May 2017, at 14:27, Greg Rose wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 19:56 +, root wrote:
>> From: Raymond Burkholder
>>
>> Current versions of systemd in Debian Stretch use
>> SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT instead of _SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT.
>> Provide both variables in the .init files.
>>
On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 14:41 -0600, Raymond Burkholder wrote:
> > On 24 May 2017, at 14:27, Greg Rose wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 19:56 +, root wrote:
> >> From: Raymond Burkholder
> >>
> >> Current versions of systemd in Debian Stretch use
> >> SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT instead of _S
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:05:24AM -0700, Guru Shetty wrote:
> On 15 May 2017 at 16:49, Joe Stringer wrote:
>
> > On 12 May 2017 at 07:45, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> > > RHEL 6 is not supported anymore since it uses Python 2.6 and GCC 4.4.x,
> > > but Open vSwitch needs, at least, Python 2.7 and
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Greg Rose wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 16:02 -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> Clang 4.0 has added some new warnings around taking the address of packed
>> members of structures which may result in unaligned pointer values. This
>> series
>> addresses the resulting
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 04:02:12PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Clang 4.0 complains:
>
> ../lib/odp-execute.c:61:37: error: taking address of packed member 'eth_dst'
> of
> class or structure 'eth_header' may result in an unaligned pointer value
> [-Werror,-Waddress-of-packed-member]
>
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 04:02:13PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Clang 4.0 complains:
>
> ../ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c:2291:46: error: taking address of packed member
> 'eth_src' of class or structure 'eth_header' may result in an unaligned
> pointer
> value
> [-Werror,-Waddress-of-packed-membe
Set flow->dl_type to either ETH_TYPE_IP or ETH_TYPE_IPV6 when probing for
ct_orig_tuple feature support. This can be expanded later on to check for
both IPv4 and IPv6 support.
Signed-off-by: Sairam Venugopal
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deleti
28 matches
Mail list logo
