Hi,
Eelco Chaudron 于2023年5月11日周四 15:04写道：
>
>
> On 4 May 2023, at 9:50, Peng He wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry for the late reply.
> >
> > Yes, basically this means going back to v5, but with a minor difference.
> >
> > In the original v5, the INCONSISTENT to EVICTING change is in the
> > reval
Great, thanks!
Eelco Chaudron 于2023年5月11日周四 15:02写道：
>
>
> On 4 May 2023, at 13:29, Peng He wrote:
>
> > The following comments (brought in at 0de8783a9):
> >
> > /* XXX: There's a race window where a flow covering this packet
> > * could have already been installed since we last did the flow
>
On 2023/05/11 20:50, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 5/11/23 12:39, Nobuhiro MIKI wrote:
>> On 2023/05/11 6:33, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 5/9/23 11:38, Nobuhiro MIKI wrote:
It supports flowlabel based load balancing by controlling the flowlabel
of outer IPv6 header, which is already implement
On 5/11/23 18:13, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> At present, the system-dpdk-testsuite makes assumptions about
> environment configuration, and will error out if DPDK compatible
> interfaces not configured for DPDK are present in the system with
> a message like:
>
> EAL: Probe PCI driver: net_virtio (1af
On 5/11/23 15:38, Stefan Hoffmann wrote:
> This tests stream.c and stream.py with ssl connection at
> CHECK_STREAM_OPEN_BLOCK.
> For the tests, ovsdb needs to be build with libssl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hoffmann
> ---
>
> Changes based on comments from Ilya Maximets:
> use m4_join; use m4_su
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:22 AM Lorenzo Bianconi
> wrote:
> >
> > Rework OVN QoS implementation in order to configure it through OVS QoS
> > table instead of running tc command directly bypassing OVS.
> >
> > Acked-By: Ihar Hrachyshka
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
> > Tested-by: Rodolfo Alons
On 5/11/23 15:35, Stefan Hoffmann wrote:
> Define bash function as macro now. Later we can extend this macro for other
> usecases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hoffmann
> ---
>
> Rework due to hints from Ilya Maximets: no empty quotes inside brackets and
> move m4_define out of m4_divert_text
>
>
On 5/10/23 10:35, Zhiqi Chen via dev wrote:
> Command with empty string following "dpctl/ct-get-limits zone="
> such as "ovs-appctl dpctl/ct-get-limits zone=" will cause
> parse_ct_limit_zones() dereferencing null.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiqi Chen
Thanks! Applied and backported down to 2.17.
Best
At present, the system-dpdk-testsuite makes assumptions about
environment configuration, and will error out if DPDK compatible
interfaces not configured for DPDK are present in the system with
a message like:
EAL: Probe PCI driver: net_virtio (1af4:1000) device: :00:03.0 (socket -1)
eth_virtio
Hello, Dumitru, Daniel and team,
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 5:23 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> Hi Frode,
>
> During an internal discussion with RedHat OpenStack folks (Daniel in cc)
> about scalability of OVN in OpenStack deployments I remembered that you
> mentioned that you're thinking of enhancing
Bleep bloop. Greetings Frode Nordahl, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
git-am:
error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (tests/system-dpdk-macros.at).
error: could not buil
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 9:29 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 5/11/23 15:14, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> > On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 11:39 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/4/23 22:09, Mark Michelson wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> A recent thread [1] had several topics of discussion come up about
>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:25 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 11:06 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi Han,
> >
> > For both patches in the series,
> >
> > Acked-by: Mark Michelson
> >
> Thanks Mark. I applied to main.
>
> > I want to put a reply to patch 2 directly, but unfortuna
At present, the system-dpdk-testsuite makes assumptions about
environment configuration, and will error out if DPDK compatible
interfaces not configured for DPDK are present in the system with
a message like:
INFO|EAL: Probe PCI driver: net_virtio (1af4:1000) device: :00:03.0 (socket
-1)
ERR|
On 5/11/23 15:49, Stefan Hoffmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 15:38 +0200, Stefan Hoffmann wrote:
>> This tests stream.c and stream.py with ssl connection at
>> CHECK_STREAM_OPEN_BLOCK.
>> For the tests, ovsdb needs to be build with libssl.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hoffmann
>> ---
>>
>> Chan
Hi Frode,
During an internal discussion with RedHat OpenStack folks (Daniel in cc)
about scalability of OVN in OpenStack deployments I remembered that you
mentioned that you're thinking of enhancing ovn-heater in order to test
your types of deployments [0]. I assumed that those are also OpenStack
Ales Musil writes:
> Use the backtrace functions that is provided by libc,
> this allows us to get backtrace that is independent of
> the current memory map of the process. Which in turn can
> be used for debugging/tracing purpose. The backtrace
> is not 100% accurate due to various optimizations
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 15:38 +0200, Stefan Hoffmann wrote:
> This tests stream.c and stream.py with ssl connection at
> CHECK_STREAM_OPEN_BLOCK.
> For the tests, ovsdb needs to be build with libssl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hoffmann
> ---
>
> Changes based on comments from Ilya Maximets:
> use m
This tests stream.c and stream.py with ssl connection at
CHECK_STREAM_OPEN_BLOCK.
For the tests, ovsdb needs to be build with libssl.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hoffmann
---
Changes based on comments from Ilya Maximets:
use m4_join; use m4_substr directly at call, without using variable in
between
H
Define bash function as macro now. Later we can extend this macro for other
usecases.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hoffmann
---
Rework due to hints from Ilya Maximets: no empty quotes inside brackets and
move m4_define out of m4_divert_text
tests/ovsdb-idl.at | 83 +---
On 5/11/23 15:14, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 11:39 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>>
>> On 5/4/23 22:09, Mark Michelson wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> A recent thread [1] had several topics of discussion come up about
>>> proposed changes to OVN release management. This thread is specifica
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 11:39 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 5/4/23 22:09, Mark Michelson wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A recent thread [1] had several topics of discussion come up about
> > proposed changes to OVN release management. This thread is specifically
> > to discuss the support lifetime of
On 25/04/2023 15:41, Roi Dayan wrote:
> From: Gavin Li
>
> Add TC offload support for vxlan encap with gbp option
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Li
> Reviewed-by: Gavi Teitz
> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan
> ---
> acinclude.m4 | 7
> include/linux/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h |
On 10/05/2023 17:10, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 06:39:22PM +0200, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 4/25/23 14:41, Roi Dayan wrote:
>>> From: Gavin Li
>>>
>>> Linux kernel netlink module added NLA_F_NESTED flag checking for nested
>>> netlink messages in 5.2. A nested message withou
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 21:22 +0200, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 5/9/23 10:25, Stefan Hoffmann wrote:
> > This tests stream.c and stream.py with ssl connection at
> > CHECK_STREAM_OPEN_BLOCK.
> > For the tests, ovsdb needs to be build with libssl.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hoffmann
> > ---
> > t
On 5/11/23 12:39, Nobuhiro MIKI wrote:
> On 2023/05/11 6:33, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 5/9/23 11:38, Nobuhiro MIKI wrote:
>>> It supports flowlabel based load balancing by controlling the flowlabel
>>> of outer IPv6 header, which is already implemented in Linux kernel as
>>> seg6_flowlabel sysctl
Hello, Roi,
Thank you for your prompt reply, see response in-line below.
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:51 PM Roi Dayan wrote:
> On 11/05/2023 13:03, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> > The tc module combines the use of the `tc_transact` helper
> > function for communication with the in-kernel tc infrastructur
On 11/05/2023 13:03, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> The tc module combines the use of the `tc_transact` helper
> function for communication with the in-kernel tc infrastructure
> with assertions on the reply data by `ofpbuf_at_assert` on the
> received data prior to further processing.
>
> `tc_transact
On 2023/05/11 6:33, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 5/9/23 11:38, Nobuhiro MIKI wrote:
>> It supports flowlabel based load balancing by controlling the flowlabel
>> of outer IPv6 header, which is already implemented in Linux kernel as
>> seg6_flowlabel sysctl [1].
>>
>> [1]: https://docs.kernel.org/netwo
The tc module combines the use of the `tc_transact` helper
function for communication with the in-kernel tc infrastructure
with assertions on the reply data by `ofpbuf_at_assert` on the
received data prior to further processing.
`tc_transact` in turn calls `nl_transact`, which via
`nl_transact_mul
On 2023/05/11 5:56, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 5/9/23 11:37, Nobuhiro MIKI wrote:
>> For tunnels such as SRv6, some popular vendor appliances support
>> IPv6 flowlabel based load balancing. In preparation for OVS to
>> support it, this patch modifies the encapsulation to allow IPv6
>> flowlabel to b
Bleep bloop. Greetings Ales Musil, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Line lacks whitespace around operator
#51 FILE: controller/mac-learn.c:216:
bp->expi
There was a race within packet buffering that could
result in first packt being dropped. It could happen
under following conditions and topology:
S1 == R1 == public == R2 == S2
SNAT on R1 and DGP on port connecting R1 with public.
1) The GARP is sent for the DGP SNAT
2) The GARP is delayed on R2 b
On 1 May 2023, at 13:33, mit...@outlook.com wrote:
> From: Lin Huang
>
> OvS has supported packet-per-second policer which can be set at ingress
> and egress side in kernel datapath. But the userspace datapath dosen't
> support for ingress and egress packet-per-second policing now.
>
> So, this
On 1 May 2023, at 13:33, mit...@outlook.com wrote:
> From: Lin Huang
>
> OvS has supported packet-per-second policer which can be set at ingress
> and egress side in kernel datapath. But the userspace datapath dosen't
> support for ingress and egress packet-per-second policing now.
>
> So, this
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:43:31PM +0800, miter wrote:
> Hi simon,
>
>
> Thanks for your reviewing.
>
>
> On 5/10/2023 10:34 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 07:33:38PM +0800, mit...@outlook.com wrote:
> > > From: Lin Huang
...
> > > Examples:
> > > $ovs-vsctl set port vho
On 10 May 2023, at 23:41, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 5/9/23 16:29, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>> When doing performance testing with OVS v3.1 we ran into a deadlock
>> situation with the netdev_hmap_rwlock read/write lock. After some
>> debugging, it was discovered that the netdev_hmap_rwlock read lo
On 4 May 2023, at 9:50, Peng He wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the late reply.
>
> Yes, basically this means going back to v5, but with a minor difference.
>
> In the original v5, the INCONSISTENT to EVICTING change is in the
> revalidate_sweep__ phrase.
>
> However，since you have spot that doing so
On 4 May 2023, at 13:29, Peng He wrote:
> The following comments (brought in at 0de8783a9):
>
> /* XXX: There's a race window where a flow covering this packet
> * could have already been installed since we last did the flow
> * lookup before upcall. This could be solved by moving the
> * m
39 matches
Mail list logo
