On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:08:36AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Terry Wilson writes:
>
> >> Gather 'round folks, and let me tell you the tale of a series long
> >> ago posted:
> >>
> >> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2016-August/321866.html
> >>
> >> Something... something ...
Terry Wilson writes:
>> Gather 'round folks, and let me tell you the tale of a series long
>> ago posted:
>>
>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2016-August/321866.html
>>
>> Something... something ... black magic...
>> I think the fchmod needs to happen after the bind for the
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:38:01PM -0500, Terry Wilson wrote:
> >> It doesn't (and never has) on my Centos 7 machine. I ran into this a
> >> couple of years ago and ended up just working around it. As an example
> >> after make rpm-fedora and installing:
> >> [centos@test x86_64]$ ls -al
>> It doesn't (and never has) on my Centos 7 machine. I ran into this a
>> couple of years ago and ended up just working around it. As an example
>> after make rpm-fedora and installing:
>> [centos@test x86_64]$ ls -al /var/run/openvswitch/db.sock
>> srwxr-x---. 1 openvswitch openvswitch0 Aug
> Gather 'round folks, and let me tell you the tale of a series long
> ago posted:
>
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2016-August/321866.html
>
> Something... something ... black magic...
> I think the fchmod needs to happen after the bind for the permissions
> to actually be
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 06:58:54PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Terry Wilson writes:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 07:55:09PM +, Terry Wilson wrote:
> >>> Unix sockets were not being created with the permission 0770,
> >>> instead using
Terry Wilson writes:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 07:55:09PM +, Terry Wilson wrote:
>>> Unix sockets were not being created with the permission 0770,
>>> instead using the current umask value. The manpage for fchmod()
>>> states that that if
>> Surely there's a better way to do this.
>
> I *hope* so. I mean it certainly seems like something one would want
> to be able to do, but I remember looking for a couple of days 2 years
> ago and giving up. umask seemed like the only reliable option.
> Whatever the solution is, fchmod is *not*
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 07:55:09PM +, Terry Wilson wrote:
>> Unix sockets were not being created with the permission 0770,
>> instead using the current umask value. The manpage for fchmod()
>> states that that if filedes refers to a socket,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 07:55:09PM +, Terry Wilson wrote:
> Unix sockets were not being created with the permission 0770,
> instead using the current umask value. The manpage for fchmod()
> states that that if filedes refers to a socket, the behavior is
> undefined. Insetad, use the same code
10 matches
Mail list logo
