On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:53 AM Simon Horman wrote:
> > > 3. SUPPORT_TC_INGRESS_PPS is intended to check if
> > >TC police action with PPS rate is supported by the kernel.
> >
> > Well, back to this topic then.
> > SUPPORT_TC_INGRESS_PPS does not exist anymore.
> > So I guess we should at
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:34:22AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:20 AM Simon Horman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 06:28:13PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > > Caught during some code review.
> > > The incriminated commit had put an unneeded check on tc
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:20 AM Simon Horman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 06:28:13PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > Caught during some code review.
> > The incriminated commit had put an unneeded check on tc ingress support
> > for the meter offloading test.
> >
> > Note:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 06:28:13PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Caught during some code review.
> The incriminated commit had put an unneeded check on tc ingress support
> for the meter offloading test.
>
> Note: SUPPORT_TC_INGRESS_PPS had been reworked in the commit 5f0fdf5e2c2e
> ("test: Move
Caught during some code review.
The incriminated commit had put an unneeded check on tc ingress support
for the meter offloading test.
Note: SUPPORT_TC_INGRESS_PPS had been reworked in the commit 5f0fdf5e2c2e
("test: Move check for tc ingress pps support to test script.").
Fixes: 5660b89a309d
