On 2/17/21 2:49 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 03:43:22PM +0100, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at
index 6e396895826f..2e4eaf7f12f7 100644
--- a/tests/ovn.at
+++ b/tests/ovn.at
@@ -16982,6 +16982,10 @@ AT_CLEANUP
OVN_FOR_EACH_NORTHD([
On 2/16/21 10:16 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 03:43:22PM +0100, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
There are a few tests that fail (also northd-C tests) and I suspect it's
because the OVS IDL split patches [0] this commit depends on don't
include some of the recent fixes that went into the
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 03:43:22PM +0100, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> > diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at
> > index 6e396895826f..2e4eaf7f12f7 100644
> > --- a/tests/ovn.at
> > +++ b/tests/ovn.at
> > @@ -16982,6 +16982,10 @@ AT_CLEANUP
> >
> > OVN_FOR_EACH_NORTHD([
> > AT_SETUP([ovn -- IGMP
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 03:43:22PM +0100, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> There are a few tests that fail (also northd-C tests) and I suspect it's
> because the OVS IDL split patches [0] this commit depends on don't
> include some of the recent fixes that went into the OVS IDL code, at
> least the
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 03:43:22PM +0100, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> Also, I'm still seeing the libopenvswitchavx512.la related error we
> reported earlier:
>
> error: failed to run `rustc` to learn about target-specific information
>
> Caused by:
> process didn't exit successfully: `rustc -
On 12/2/20 7:50 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> From: Leonid Ryzhyk
>
> This implementation is incremental, meaning that it only recalculates
> what is needed for the southbound database when northbound changes
> occur. It is expected to scale better than the C implementation,
> for large deployments.
Bleep bloop. Greetings Ben Pfaff, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Comment with 'xxx' marker
#3534 FILE: northd/ovn-northd-ddlog.c:164:
.cs =
